We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is amazing, it does well when you need to use it."
"It can hook on at the code level, then tell me all the details that I need."
"It is a platform that is very well-suited for marketers, but also for technology people. That is the key: the dashboard."
"The visibility that it provides through the application's behavior allows us to find trends based on our customized metrics."
"It provides the whole perspective in a single place when trying to guide the right people to go to the right solution at any given point in time."
"We can analyse problems more quickly, and detecting problems becomes easier with Dynatrace."
"Since we have been receiving alerts from Dynatrace, we go ahead and fix them without the user knowing about them."
"Interrelating the logs and infrastructure issues, application issues, DC RUM, everything in one dashboard, saves us time in troubleshooting."
"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."
"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."
"SSO options are missing."
"The installation process had quite a few moving parts, so it was a little tricky getting everything to work in first go."
"I would like to see Dynatrace be more user-friendly. Sometimes there are too many options to use from, which is good, but it can become confusing on how to proceed."
"The functionality needs improvement."
"For the user, for the customer, they expect a solution to be not so expensive."
"Log analytics in the classic synthetic and RUM tools would be a great addition."
"I think Dynatrace needs improvements with respect to reporting; not just performance, but the business-level reports."
"It's not very scalable, we cannot add another server onto it."
"The user interface was not good."
"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."
More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 341 reviews while IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is ranked 55th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager writes "Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is most compared with IBM Application Performance Management and Azure Monitor. See our Dynatrace vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.