We performed a comparison between F5 Advanced WAF and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."It's flexible and powerful, and the users can input their own rules to the system."
"The web application firewall itself is most valuable. It provides positive security and negative security. In negative security, it blocks a task such as cross-site scripting, code injection, etc. In positive security, it lets you specify and enforce things, such as the parameters allowed in username and password fields and the number of characters allowed in a field."
"The anti-bot protection is the solution's most valuable feature. Safe-guard or credential staffing are also useful features."
"The solution is stable."
"The initial setup was was easy to install."
"In terms of F5 Advanced WAF's most valuable features, I would definitely say its stability. F5 is one the most stable products. Either as the load balancer or the web application firewall, it is very stable."
"It's a fairly easy-to-use and user-friendly tool. My administrators and team also like its ability to customize the rules per the requirements."
"It's scalable and very easy to manage."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"I would like to see a better interface and better documentation compatibility with other products. It's more complicated with OWASP."
"The solution's dashboard could be improved. When you're moving from policy to policy, the logs and the integration of the logs in other systems aren't straightforward."
"Most customers encounter stability issues with the product's Big-IP logs."
"The contextual-based component needs a lot of help to catch up with the next-gen products."
"F5 Advanced WAF could improve the reporting. It's a bit difficult to populate, them. If you're not so familiar with the functions, such as where to find the logs and other settings."
"The deployment side is quite complex."
"I would not expect traffic details to pass through the web application firewall across the length of the whole application. I think that there is a web application where it can let the application function without traffic going in into the WAF."
"F5 Advanced needs to improve its bot protection. The solution needs to have machine learning to learn the behavior of the customer to recognize the human versus the bot. This is a difficult feature to explain to our customers. I would like documentation about the bot feature to make it easier for the customer to understand."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
F5 Advanced WAF is ranked 2nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 55 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. F5 Advanced WAF is rated 8.6, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of F5 Advanced WAF writes "Flexible configuration, reliable, and highly professional support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". F5 Advanced WAF is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, AWS WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.