We performed a comparison between FICO Blaze Advisor and IBM Operational Decision Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Rules Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the IDE."
"The rules management application is the best feature because BAs or even, perhaps, a businessperson, can directly create rules, change rules, and deploy them to production directly."
"FICO Blaze Advisor's most valuable features are the analytics, the code change is not required, and even a business analyst can do that change in the rules when we set it up."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the algorithm they use in the retail version. The execution there is very optimized - so even though we have a huge service with huge counter rules, we still get the results in milliseconds. That is something amazing I found about this tool."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that it has a fast engine for decisioning."
"The solution is very stable."
"The solution is customizable, so you can create your own data items and variables to suit your needs."
"With ODM as a centralized rules engine, it's easy to track. You can version the rules in the ODM engine itself."
"It reduces operating costs because you are taking some of this work out of the high cost IT people, freeing them up to work on new initiatives and getting them out of maintenance mode. Now, the business people are the ones making business decisions on what needs to change. They are hands on making these changes."
"ODM's most valuable features are that it's easy to define and divide business rules, and it can handle very large numbers of transactions per second."
"The most valuable feature is the deployment part because it is very easy to deploy. Even a businessperson or someone from a non-technical background can easily deploy it and the rules will work."
"The effects of allowing business users to update business rules instead of IT are business users have a closer relationship with what rules they need and are able to make those rules a lot quicker in the tools that ODM provides than if an IT person had to do it, and do it in code, requiring compiling code and deploying it."
"It has benefited our organization by having less coding changes. Thus, we save time and don't have to hire as many people."
"Its ability to untangle hard coded rules and put them in a more manageable structure."
"By using ODM, we get rules to our applications, then we get those applications to go to market a lot faster."
"The initial setup of FICO Blaze Advisor was somewhat complex. The implementation took approximately three to four months. However, I left halfway through the process, I am not sure of the exact timeframe."
"The developer's tools on their optimized version should be a little bit more user friendly. Additionally, it really doesn't pick up the actual exception or error of what the developers are getting."
"FICO needs to provide a better user experience and user interface."
"More online support such as a knowledge base should be available."
"Lacks notifications when code changes have been made."
"FICO Blaze Advisor is still missing things for maintaining the version of something. For example, we have gates for programming, for storing, or scripts. In there, one developer can prepare a file or a piece of code or something, and another developer can work on the same code or on the same text file or something, and you can manage it. This is missing in FICO Blaze Advisor."
"I would like to see more help on the internet and more training over the internet. They only have a few blogs there, so that should be increased."
"The only thing we have trouble with is integrating IBM ODM with the cloud. The product is on-prem, and we need to migrate the rules to the cloud. It's a hectic process."
"There is some promise of how decisions could take advantage of machine learning and artificial intelligence. That has been slow to develop. It is still not clear where the market will take it, but that is something that I am looking forward to down the road."
"One area for improvement is master data integration. That should be more fluid. The others are hierarchical drop-down lists, and hierarchical master data."
"Extracting specific rules could be better. We've had to do a lot of custom work on that. The testing, we've played a little bit with it, but we have our own testing methods. If it could be as simple as we have for our custom work, that would be great."
"An area for improvement is that the documentation for ODM is huge and not very clear."
"I think it's stable, but if they could beef it up a little bit for bigger businesses, that'd be great, because we have so much in there. We have products that we have to split up because they are too big for it to handle sometimes. But that's just in development, within ODM. Again, processing has been fine, but I wish things were a little bit beefier."
"I would like to have integration of the user interfaces, and they are putting them together in the next version of the solution."
"ODM could be improved with better integration with other platforms."
More IBM Operational Decision Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
FICO Blaze Advisor is ranked 2nd in Business Rules Management with 8 reviews while IBM Operational Decision Manager is ranked 3rd in Business Rules Management with 15 reviews. FICO Blaze Advisor is rated 8.2, while IBM Operational Decision Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of FICO Blaze Advisor writes "The solution is stable and has the ability to extend the built-in logic, but is difficult to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Operational Decision Manager writes "The solution provides an efficient, comprehensive way to manage polices for all the applications". FICO Blaze Advisor is most compared with PegaRULES and Versata BRMS, whereas IBM Operational Decision Manager is most compared with PegaRULES and Progress Corticon . See our FICO Blaze Advisor vs. IBM Operational Decision Manager report.
See our list of best Business Rules Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Rules Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.