We performed a comparison between ForgeRock and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very scalable. We have a lot of users that have been increasing over the years that we have been using it. We have approximately 20,000 users."
"The most valuable features of ForgeRock are social login and data protection."
"Installation and configuration are pretty easy for ForgeRock OpenIDM."
"ForgeRock has CIAM, which other products didn't have, and they have DevOps ready."
"This is a stable solution. When you do experience any issues, you will see it in your DB logs or audit logs so you can easily reach a conclusion of might be causing it."
"Easy to navigate, handle and manage the applications."
"The support is good and prompt."
"ForgeRock products are customizable, and the out-of-the-box features are solid, too. I primarily use the OIDC compliance features. It's just a configuration. it's easy to set up and customize trees. We can add our own features if necessary. Banks and corporations have different standards and specific validations."
"The feature that is most valuable to me is the automated user provisioning that we set up using Okta as a major part of that process."
"It's easy to use and straightforward."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"We can automate the process of adding users to Okta if they are activated in Active Directory, or if they are added to the database of applications or Active Directory in the last couple of days."
"Okta has introduced the Universal Directory. It has custom attribute capability and user permissions to read/write on their profiles or hide them. Profile sources and identity profile sourcing are two different components that I haven't seen in other products."
"It is dependent on the evolution of your user base. It depends on usage per user, so the more sign-ins there are, the more expensive it becomes, so it works best for smaller companies from a financial perspective."
"Workforce Identity's best features include its user-friendliness and easy setup."
"It's reliable and it does what it is advertised to do."
"The solution's documentation is not very good, and they do not give more details."
"The solution could improve by adding more advertising and marketing."
"In an upcoming release, the solution could improve by limiting the need to do customizations."
"We're worried about the scaling. We're told it will be okay and there won't be issues, however, I'm not 100% convinced."
"It should be a little bit easier to implement. It is user-friendly, but there is always scope for improvement."
"The product's support services in the French language are not free."
"It should have a better user interface. Its flexibility should also be improved. It is not about simplifying; it is more about flexibility. Each company has its own requirements, and ForgeRock can provide more flexibility in terms of the use of existing modules to implement features for the customers."
"I find that it's quite expensive for just an open-source system. Support is quite expensive."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the support system, they are too slow."
"The solution’s policies are difficult to understand due to the policy methods. They use authentication. The solution’s workflow is also difficult and not very active. They need to have proper documentation on it. In the next release, I would like to see the workflows being more digestible."
"You can't hide the device when you're checking logs."
"We still had to write several internal programs/scripts to complete the user-provisioning process. Okta does not have the ability to provision mailbox accounts for on-premise Exchange or in a hybrid O365 environment. The Group Push function from Okta to AD did not work reliably in our environment."
"There are some issues with the interface that can be improved."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve provisioning it can be made simpler."
"We had some implementation issues."
ForgeRock is ranked 5th in Access Management with 27 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Access Management with 59 reviews. ForgeRock is rated 8.0, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Governance and access management solution used for multi-factor authentication that is outdated with an unresponsive UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Ping Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0 and NetIQ Identity Manager, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt and Auth0. See our ForgeRock vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
