We compared Fortinet FortiEDR and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Fortinet FortiEDR requires improvements in user interface, setup process, documentation, and reporting capabilities. Users appreciate its threat detection capabilities and customer service. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint features comprehensive threat protection, real-time monitoring, and efficient incident response. Users praise its customer service, pricing, and effectiveness in threat detection but suggest some areas for improvement. Overall, Fortinet FortiEDR focuses on enhancements in usability and reporting, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint emphasizes comprehensive threat protection and real-time monitoring.
Features: Fortinet FortiEDR is praised for its advanced threat detection, seamless integration, and user-friendly interface. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in comprehensive threat protection, real-time monitoring, and effective incident response capabilities.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Fortinet FortiEDR is reported to be straightforward and hassle-free, requiring minimal effort. Customers also appreciate the flexibility of licensing options that allow them to choose the most suitable model. Similarly, with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, users found the pricing reasonable, setup process straightforward, and licensing options flexible for different organizational needs., Fortinet FortiEDR offers a positive ROI based on user feedback. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also has a positive ROI, with users praising its performance, effectiveness, and real-time insights.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiEDR could benefit from improvements in user interface, ease of use, setup process, documentation, training resources, reporting capabilities, and dashboards. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has areas for enhancement according to user feedback.
Deployment and customer support: Based on user reviews, the implementation duration for Fortinet FortiEDR varies, with some users taking three months for deployment and a week for setup. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also has varying reviews, with some users taking three months for deployment and a week for setup. It is important to consider the context in which these timeframes are mentioned., Customers have reported positive experiences with the customer service of both Fortinet FortiEDR and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. However, Fortinet is praised for its excellent assistance and guidance, while Microsoft is commended for the helpfulness, efficiency, and promptness of their support team.
The summary above is based on 106 interviews we conducted recently with Fortinet FortiEDR and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"The stability is very good."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"It's not really visible for the user - which is a benefit."
"This product is flexible, and it is very easy to get updates from the Microsoft website."
"It automatically detects intrusion and malware."
"The features I have found most valuable are the ransomware and malware protection. The solution detects malware live and whenever it detects suspicious activity, it quarantines it."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"The whole bundle of the product, which is similar to other Microsoft products, is valuable. Ten years ago, you had third-party stuff for different things. You had one solution for email archiving and another third-party one for something else. Nowadays, Microsoft Office covers all the stuff that was formerly covered by third-party solutions. It is the same with antivirus. The functionality is just basic. You have the scanning, and then you also have a kind of cloud-based protection and reporting about your environment. With Microsoft Security Center, you have a complete overview of your environment. You know the software inventory, and you have security recommendations. You can not only see that the antivirus is up to date; you can also see where are the vulnerabilities in your system. Microsoft Security Center tells you where you have old, deprecated software and what kind of CVEs are addressed. It's really cool stuff."
"The performance of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has been a valuable feature."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is different from other security tools because we can configure it to use multiple types of scanning or archiving."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The solution is not stable."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"It makes your Surface devices hot. It is resource-intensive. It strains your CPU, not more than other file scanners around, but it also does a lot more. When you are transmitting files or data, it is continuously scanning the traffic and analyzing it bit by bit to see what's going on, and that, of course, is costly in terms of CPU. It is CPU intensive, and if you are on battery, it drains your battery fast. That's the only drawback that it has."
"There's a lot of manual effort involved to configure what we need."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's licensing is confusing. It has conflicting information on the website. We also faced integration issues with other systems. It makes laptops slower than traditional antivirus systems."
"Where we stand right now, compared to other products that are there in the market, they still have to work on their threat intelligence and the overall maturity of detecting the malware."
"The automation could be simpler on the mitigation side. It has a learning curve. Otherwise, it's pretty easy."
"There could be an increase in security for the solution."
"Localization is always a challenge, especially with new products you typically want. Solutions are designed to be deployed where the most licenses are being consumed, such as in the United States. They focus on US products, devices, and networks. Specialized deployments for other countries would allow for a smoother experience in transition."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint should have more transparency. In the latest edition of Windows, Windows 11, it is a compulsory requirement to connect to a Microsoft account, which in turn has implications for Defender. This should be removed."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiEDR is ranked 13th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 30 reviews while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 182 reviews. Fortinet FortiEDR is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiEDR writes "A proactive solution that works as a proactive upgrade from a firewall". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". Fortinet FortiEDR is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon and Microsoft Intune. See our Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
