We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiSandbox and Palo Alto Networks WildFire based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The GUI makes administration tasks straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance it offers to users is good, making it useful for us in our company."
"The main benefit of Fortinet FortiSandbox is that it allows organizations to detect and prevent unknown threats from entering an infrastructure."
"The most valuable features for me when it comes to Fortinet FortiSandbox are the integrity of the Sandbox and the power of the analyzing tool of the solution."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiSandbox are the analysis options, artificial intelligence, and the many interfaces it provides."
"The technical support is very good."
"Performance is a valuable feature."
"FortiSandbox helps us handle unknown threats. Every vendor is competing for who can detect an unknown threat the fastest. Fortinet is competitive in the market."
"I love the idea of Palo Alto Networks WildFire. It's more geared toward preventing malware. If someone's laptop or phone is malware-infected, the tool prevents it from uploading valuable corporate data outside the corporate network. That's what I love about Palo Alto Networks WildFire. It stops malware in its tracks."
"The most valuable features of this solution are sandbox capabilities."
"WildFire's application encryption is useful."
"They have many different options with Palo Alto WildFire and the set-up is quick. If you have all the details in hand, it does not take more than 15 minutes to deploy a firewall."
"We get support in the free version."
"The most valuable features of the solution are user-friendliness, price, good security, and cloud-related options."
"The way that the solution quickly updates to adjust to threats is the solution's most valuable aspect. When there's a security attack, within five minutes, all Wildfire subscribers have access to updates so that all systems will be safe. Its threat prevention is way better than other vendor products."
"What I like about Palo Alto is that it is a complete product, with everything in it."
"The licensing can be very confusing. It needs to be simplified."
"I would like to have machine learning added to the solution in a future release."
"For the MSSPs, it would be great if the product could display all the threat chains on a dashboard since it is an area where the tool is currently lacking."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox should improve its performance and security accuracy to keep competitive with other solutions, such as IBM."
"Product could include a user interface and be made simpler for customers to configure."
"The area I would like this solution to be improved in is the integrations for Sandbox with AI and big data ML mechanisms. I think this would be a practical improvement."
"In the next release, I would like to see machine learning and anti-exploitation included."
"The main area of concern in Fortinet FortiSandbox is its detection capabilities."
"The product's false positive logs could be more user-friendly to understand. They could provide examples of precious cases to learn."
"The free version does not have real-time updates. It is slow."
"In the future, I would like to see more automation in the reporting."
"The price of WildFire should be reduced in order to make it more affordable for our customers."
"The automation and responsiveness need improvement."
"The threat intelligence that we receiving in the reporting was not as expected. We were expecting more. Additionally, we should be able to whitelist a specific file based on a variety of attributes."
"Other vendors have some sort of bandwidth management built into the firewall itself and Palo Alto is missing that."
"Management and web filtering can be improved. There should also be better reporting, particularly around web filtering."
Fortinet FortiSandbox is ranked 4th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 36 reviews while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is ranked 3rd in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 58 reviews. Fortinet FortiSandbox is rated 8.2, while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Light and powerful solution design; useful to have". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks WildFire writes "Good technical support and provides automatic analysis that saves us time in filtering email". Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Trellix Network Detection and Response, Check Point SandBlast Network, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Fortinet FortiEDR and Cisco Secure Network Analytics, whereas Palo Alto Networks WildFire is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate, Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Proofpoint Email Protection and Check Point SandBlast Network. See our Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Palo Alto Networks WildFire report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.