Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortinet Logo
6,962 views|3,880 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Kaseya Logo
593 views|346 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiSIEM and Kaseya Traverse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Microsoft, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM).
To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product's initial setup phase was easy.""Our customer did not have security monitoring in the first place. With this solution, it provided security posture management and visibility about the security landscape and threats that they had.""We have many application systems, and I can set up Fortinet FortiSIEM for users to monitor their systems.""We're able to get real-timec as well as our customer networks that we're monitoring at all times.""The interface is very easy to use. The connector in the core has FortiSIEM support from the vendor.""The event correlation is pretty robust. The GUI is pretty good.""The advanced agents used to collect logs have been most valuable. We have also made use of the advanced intelligence this solution offers.""To add workers and even collectors is pretty easy."

More Fortinet FortiSIEM Pros →

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly.""It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution.""Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap.""Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating.""The remote support and data collection features are great.""It's a simple and humble tool.""We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

More Kaseya Traverse Pros →

Cons
"Their product support, in general, is not that great. The product support is in the same ecosystem. Their support is improving but it's not that great.vvv""The process of installing Fortinet FortiSIEM and the customization of the alerts take too long.""It would be good if the solution offered even more configuration options, especially in relation to the VPN so that it continues to be a very flexible option.""The dashboards need to be improved. It gives you so much detail, but sometimes too much detail, especially to an executive, it's too much.""The solution's interface could be modernized and improved.""FortiSIEM could be better integrated with other vendors.""Their technical support is horrible. By horrible, I mean a train wreck of a disaster that has fallen off a bridge and caught fire.""An improvement would be if FortiSIEM's licensing was based on the number of nodes rather than the EPS."

More Fortinet FortiSIEM Cons →

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect.""We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product.""In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has.""Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us.""Reporting is a bit difficult.""Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also.""The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

More Kaseya Traverse Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Please be cheaper and more simplified."
  • "We bought the perpetual license, so we own the product, but there is a three-year support renewal fee for that."
  • "Pricing is acceptable for more than 90% of our customers, as they normally get discounts."
  • "Its price can be better. We are Fortinet partners, so we can get discounts, but its price can be an issue at the beginning for others. There is a licensing scheme for every case. There are three licensing schemes that we can choose from."
  • "The price of Fortinet FortiSIEM is a lot less when compared to other solutions."
  • "They have a yearly subscription."
  • "The solution is available for both, perpetual and subscription licenses."
  • "Manageable, however would be better as pay as you go versus CapEX."
  • More Fortinet FortiSIEM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."
  • "The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."
  • More Kaseya Traverse Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Fortinet FortiSIEM needs to provide better API integrations to users.
    Top Answer:I don't have the price list of any of the competitors of Fortinet FortiSIEM. I work with the technical part of the tool. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached… more »
    Top Answer:Fortinet FortiSIEM is a better solution than other products. As a SIEM solution, it can meet all the requirements of customers. The product already offers good integration capabilities with multiple… more »
    Top Answer:The remote support and data collection features are great.
    Top Answer:The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.
    Top Answer:Reporting is a bit difficult. It’s very cumbersome to set up new reports.
    Ranking
    Views
    6,962
    Comparisons
    3,880
    Reviews
    24
    Average Words per Review
    463
    Rating
    7.6
    67th
    Views
    593
    Comparisons
    346
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    740
    Rating
    6.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    FortiSIEM, AccelOps
    Learn More
    Overview

    FortiSIEM (formerly AccelOps 4) provides an actionable security intelligence platform to monitor security, performance and compliance through a single pane of glass.

    Companies around the world use FortiSIEM for the following use cases:

    • Threat management and intelligence that provide situational awareness and anomaly detection
    • Alleviating compliance mandate concerns for PCI, HIPAA and SOX
    • Managing “alert overload”
    • Handling the “too many tools” reporting issue
    • Addressing the MSPs/MSSPs pain of meeting service level agreements

    Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

    Sample Customers
    FortiSIEM has hundreds of customers worldwide in markets including managed services, technology, financial services, healthcare, and government. Customers include Aruba Networks, Compushare, Port of San Diego, Cleveland Indians, Infoblox, Healthways, and Referentia.
    UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Media Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Government8%
    Retailer8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise34%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise52%
    REVIEWERS
    Large Enterprise100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business52%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise33%
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Microsoft, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: June 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortinet FortiSIEM is ranked 10th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 65 reviews while Kaseya Traverse is ranked 67th in Network Monitoring Software with 7 reviews. Fortinet FortiSIEM is rated 7.6, while Kaseya Traverse is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSIEM writes "It's cheaper than other solutions with the same features but lacks integration with many third-party vendors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaseya Traverse writes "A stable network monitoring tool requiring an easy initial setup phase". Fortinet FortiSIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, Microsoft Sentinel and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Kaseya Traverse is most compared with LogicMonitor, Auvik Network Management (ANM) and PRTG Network Monitor.

    We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.