We performed a comparison between froglogic Squish and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup process is straightforward."
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."
"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."
"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."
"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."
"I like that it is a robust and free open source. There is a lot of community support available, and there are a lot of developers using them. There's good community support."
"Selenium HQ's most valuable feature is picking up and entering values from web pages."
"What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do."
"Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run."
"The initial setup is straightforward. Deployment took about seven months."
"There is a supportive community around it."
"It has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only."
"The most valuable feature of Selenium is how easy it is to automate."
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."
"The price could be better."
"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."
"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."
"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."
"Selenium HQ can be complex. The interface requires a QA engineer or an expert to use it."
"Selenium has room for improvement as it does not support the tests and result-sharing in anything but a manual way."
"For people that don't know about technology, maybe it's difficult to use."
"I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers."
"It would be very great if Selenium would provide some framework examples so newcomers could get started more quickly."
"The initial setup was difficult."
"The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn."
"In the beginning, we had issues with several test cases failing during regression. Over a period of time, we built our own framework around Selenium which helped us overcome of these issues."
froglogic Squish is ranked 11th in Test Automation Tools with 18 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Regression Testing Tools with 103 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 8.8, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". froglogic Squish is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio, Eggplant Test, Katalon Studio and Sauce Labs, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify and Telerik Test Studio. See our Selenium HQ vs. froglogic Squish report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.