We performed a comparison between Git and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."
"The implementation is easy."
"We use the tool to store codes."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality."
"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."
"Version control is beneficial as it allows me to keep track of all the modifications I have made to the applications."
"The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."
"The product protects our data."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."
"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."
"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."
"I would like more documentation."
"More security is always welcome in my opinion."
"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."
"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."
"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."
"It's not very user-friendly."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."
"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."
"The pricing is quite high."
Earn 20 points
Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 37 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control with 3 reviews. Git is rated 8.6, while Liquibase is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "Offers integration with multiple databases, stable product and reduced our manual intervention". Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, Surround SCM, IBM Rational ClearCase and Bitbucket, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Bitbucket and DBmaestro Database Source Control. See our Git vs. Liquibase report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.