GitHub Advanced Security vs GitLab comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitHub Logo
3,081 views|2,703 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
GitLab Logo
4,546 views|3,575 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitHub Advanced Security and GitLab based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Advanced Security vs. GitLab Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Dependency scanning is a valuable feature.""The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem.""The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness.""It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part.""GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need.""It ensures user passwords or sensitive information are not accidentally exposed in code or reports."

More GitHub Advanced Security Pros →

"The initial setup of GitLab is pretty simple, with no complications.""The scalability is good.""The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good.""I like GitLab's security and SAS tools.""We like that we can create branches and then the branches can be reviewed and you can mesh those branches back. You can independently work with your own branch, you don't need to really control the core of other people.""It scales well.""The solution has an established roadmap that lays out its plans for upgrades over the next two to three years.""We're only using the basic features of GitLab and haven't used any advanced features. The solution works fine, so that's what we like about GitLab. We're party using GitHub and GitLab. We have a GitHub server, while we use GitLab locally or only within our team, and it works okay. We don't have any significant problems with the solution. We also found the straightforward setup, stability, and scalability of GitLab valuable."

More GitLab Pros →

Cons
"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial.""There could be DST features included in the product.""There could be a centralized dashboard to view reports of all the projects on one platform.""The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective.""The report limitations are the main issue.""The customizations are a little bit difficult."

More GitHub Advanced Security Cons →

"We would like to have easier tutorials. Their tutorials are too technical for a user to understand. They should be more detailed but less technical.""Merge conflicts and repository maintenance could improve. If there is someone new to the system they would not know if there is a conflict.""GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker.""Perhaps the integration could be better.""It could have more security integrations and the ability to check the vulnerability of the code. I don't think it is a responsibility of Gitlab, but it would be nice to have more options to integrate with.""The solution could improve by providing more integration into the CI/CD pipeline, an autocomplete search tool, and more supporting documentation.""GitLab could consider introducing a code-scanning tool. Purchasing such tools from external markets can incur charges, which might not be favorable. Integrating these features into GitLab would streamline the pipeline and make it more convenient for users.""GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."

More GitLab Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More GitHub Advanced Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part.
    Top Answer:The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective. In my company, the actual implementation phase takes time, though the tool is… more »
    Top Answer:I use the solution in my company to develop web applications and mobile apps. In my company, we use GitHub Advanced Security to check the vulnerabilities in the codes.
    Top Answer:I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers… more »
    Top Answer:I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities. Better integration and usability within the pipeline could make a significant… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,081
    Comparisons
    2,703
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    433
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    4,546
    Comparisons
    3,575
    Reviews
    48
    Average Words per Review
    409
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitHub makes extra security features available to customers under an Advanced Security license. These features are also enabled for public repositories on GitHub.com.

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise34%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitHub Advanced Security vs. GitLab
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Advanced Security vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitHub Advanced Security is ranked 16th in Application Security Tools with 6 reviews while GitLab is ranked 6th in Application Security Tools with 70 reviews. GitHub Advanced Security is rated 9.0, while GitLab is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitHub Advanced Security writes "A tool that provides ease of integration with the set of existing codes in an infrastructure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". GitHub Advanced Security is most compared with SonarQube, Snyk, Veracode, Fortify on Demand and GitGuardian Platform, whereas GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, SonarQube, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton. See our GitHub Advanced Security vs. GitLab report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.