We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use."
"It's a stable enough solution."
"Google Cloud Storage's most valuable features are that it's easy to use and navigate, and it's not expensive."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is the shared folder."
"Google Cloud Storage's most valuable feature is the native algorithms are available. Some of the algorithms are not available for the use cases that we had in Microsoft Azure. We didn't find any native algorithms and that's the reason why we decided to use the machine learning algorithms in GCP."
"I find the accessibility from various devices to be the most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage. I also like that it is integrated with Gmail and Google Groups."
"The most valuable feature is the cryptographic technology."
"The solution operates in the background and it is attached to my Gmail account. When I download files to my phone, such as pictures, they automatically go to Google Cloud Storage."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"The tool should be cheaper."
"It would be helpful to offer more packages to increase the storage."
"The solution should offer more free storage."
"The solution only allows so much space for free."
"When compared to one of its competitors, Google Cloud Storage does not have or offer a lot of services to its users. So, this is one of the downsides of the solution."
"It could be made even more secure and allow for more storage."
"I would like to see this solution made faster, cheaper, and bigger."
"The user experience needs to be simplified."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"The scalability could improve."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"The scalability could be improved."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Microsoft Azure File Storage and Huawei FusionStorage, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
