We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's robust, and it has a wide reach in terms of office applications including storage."
"I like that it is simple to use."
"I like that it is free. It's easy to use, and it's reliable."
"The performance is a valuable feature."
"Google Cloud performs well."
"Google Cloud is perceived as a cost-effective and user-friendly option, especially compared to AWS. The current affordability and ease of use make it suitable for medium-sized companies. While the complexity may increase in the future, for now, Google Cloud is considered easy to use."
"The availability of content on the solution is very valuable."
"There is no downtime. It is very reliable."
"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."
"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."
"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."
"In general, customers appreciate its ability to run different workloads, manage applications through CI/CD pipelines like Jenkins, and leverage tools like Helm charts and Kako."
"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."
"Its integration with one of the third-party platforms could be better."
"I would like to see an increase in storage with Google Cloud."
"I would like to see Google Cloud become more competitive when it comes to price."
"The price could improve. Every customer would agree, that they would like the price to be reduced."
"The analytics that they have are very focused. It serves Google and not really the client."
"They could integrate artificial intelligence into the applications."
"Integration is always something that can be improved."
"The product could always be a little bit less expensive."
"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."
"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."
"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."
"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."
"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."
More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud is ranked 5th in PaaS Clouds with 66 reviews while Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is ranked 16th in PaaS Clouds with 7 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud writes "Communication can be built on any cloud and that is a big advantage for customers". Google Cloud is most compared with Alibaba Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Linode, Pivotal Cloud Foundry and IBM Public Cloud, whereas Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is most compared with Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS. See our Google Cloud vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.