We performed a comparison between HPE ConvergedSystem and Oracle Private Cloud Appliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Converged Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"This is a scalable solution. Our customers begin with an initial configuration and later add more servers, memory and other options to meet the demands of increased processing."
"The solution's technical support was good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."
"Most of the HP products I come across are they are easy to install. That's not very complex."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to restore lost machines. Essentially its high availability capabilities are extremely valuable to us."
"We use the solution for DDI."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the flexibility and the availability of the machines."
"The tool's most valuable features are stability and scalability."
"This solution is very simple to use."
"Supports connection to most of network topology, such as VLAN and network segmentation."
"It has helped us to reduce Oracle licensing costs for database and applications."
"You will find the high availability and License Team with Oracle very valuable."
"It is scalable as the box can be increased by one compute node, if required."
"The most valuable features include distinct storage within the Oracle PCA."
"The MTG inside HP could be improved."
"The solution has a complicated front-end."
"I would like to see better manageability and integration with third-party tools."
"Pricing is an area of concern in the solution where improvements are required."
"Features that should be addressed concern the HPE functionality and the interaction with VMware."
"The interface is not fully integrated with the ESXi, which is something that could be improved."
"HPE ConvergedSystem needs to improve its management. I would like the tool to add cloud management features so that the system can be accessed anywhere from the cloud."
"The solution needs to add NFS features."
"OVM Manager Interface is using HTML5. It should be reconverted to be a Java interface."
"Patching processing takes a long time. Only one compute node is patched at a time."
"The initial setup was very complex."
"In comparison to competitors like VMware, there's a perceived need for Oracle to enhance OVM, making it more flexible and user-friendly."
More Oracle Private Cloud Appliance Pricing and Cost Advice →
HPE ConvergedSystem is ranked 3rd in Converged Infrastructure with 21 reviews while Oracle Private Cloud Appliance is ranked 5th in Converged Infrastructure with 5 reviews. HPE ConvergedSystem is rated 8.4, while Oracle Private Cloud Appliance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE ConvergedSystem writes "With good integration and expansion capabilities, the tool also offers good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Private Cloud Appliance writes "A highly efficient choice for deploying scalable and reliable middleware applications". HPE ConvergedSystem is most compared with Dell PowerEdge VRTX, FlexPod XCS and Dell VxBlock System, whereas Oracle Private Cloud Appliance is most compared with Oracle SuperCluster, Rackspace OpenStack, Dell VxBlock System and Dell PowerEdge VRTX. See our HPE ConvergedSystem vs. Oracle Private Cloud Appliance report.
See our list of best Converged Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Converged Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
