We performed a comparison between HPE Enterprise Routers and Juniper MX Series Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"HPE routers are easier to manage than any other router I've used."
"It has good scalability."
"It makes it easy to update the network technology and manage multiple deals, all without needing technical knowledge."
"The solution's initial setup is straightforward."
"These routers help us to provide high availability to our clusters."
"It is more durable than other products in the market."
"Extensive support for cellular range for Wi-Fi technologies"
"It is very stable and scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the capacity of the throughput for the firewall."
"Users are able to easily configure the whole solution via simple data."
"The most valuable feature is the standard routing protocol."
"Juniper Switches is stable, easy to use, flexible, and has good performance. Also, the technology is good. It has a lifetime warranty and the prices are also very good."
"It offers high protection and I like it."
"Juniper's custom Trio chipset drives their MX routers, offering superior performance. Juniper's design separates the control plane and the forwarding plane, which is a key aspect of their architecture. This separation provides high throughput, maintaining line-rate performance across the MX platform."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper MX Series Routers is its exceptional policy management capabilities."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Technical support could be better."
"Compatibility with other platforms could be improved."
"Its customer service could be better for older equipment models."
"I'd like to see more security features, like support for different types of encryptions."
"The solution is expensive."
"Better management tools are needed."
"They should work on lowering their prices in Brazil to stay competitive with rivals and offer customers more affordable options."
"The security features could be better."
"The third-level customer support coming from Juniper itself could be much better. To get assistance from Juniper, we sometimes have to wait for weeks and months. I don't really appreciate that. Their support should be faster."
"The integration could be better."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers could improve by adding a graphical user interface(GUI). They do not have one. Most of our team has to have a background or expertise in Juniper. When compared to other solutions, they have a GUI. It will be easier for new team members to get familiar with, configure, or set up the router. Additionally, adding some monitoring tools would help us."
"It is not scalable, unfortunately."
"Currently, I don't have specific concerns or ideas for improvement. Regarding functionalities, I appreciate the user interface of Juniper Elite. Additionally, I'm exploring the use of Juniper Routers in a Parliament environment, particularly with Baragon, and so far, I find it to be a valuable feature. We're currently facing an issue as we're in the process of building and dealing with the software, specifically transitioning from R2 to RC. It's like when there is an update in the routers, and in the process, there are chances to end up losing some of your settings. The challenge arises because the recommended configurations for RC do not align with our features, necessitating a reevaluation of many features. It would have been more efficient if the initial recommendation had been for RC, avoiding the need to redo our research. This has resulted in a loss of time for us, and we've encountered this situation multiple times."
"While it is challenging to pinpoint specific areas for enhancement, there is room for better support and updates for Ansible."
"The solution could improve by providing better training to allow more sales of the solution in the market."
HPE Enterprise Routers is ranked 8th in Routers with 7 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. HPE Enterprise Routers is rated 8.2, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of HPE Enterprise Routers writes "Durable and reliable with good networking capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". HPE Enterprise Routers is most compared with Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Routers and Switches and Cisco Cloud Services Router, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch. See our HPE Enterprise Routers vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.