We performed a comparison between ibi WebFOCUS and RapidMiner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Predictive Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It stands out for its ability to work across different platforms, support mainframe data, offer cloud integration, automate report scheduling, and provide a robust scripting language."
"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. It's highly scalable and can handle significant data volumes."
"The solution can read and write 500 different types of outputs."
"The most valuable feature is building ad hoc reports."
"RapidMiner for Windows is an excellent graphical tool for data science."
"The data science, collaboration, and IDN are very, very strong."
"We value the collaboration and governance features because it's a comprehensive platform that covers everything from data extraction to modeling operations in the ML language. RapidMiner is competitive in the ML space."
"I like not having to write all solutions from code. Being able to drag and drop controls, enables me to focus on building the best model, without needing to search for syntax errors or extra libraries."
"The solution is stable."
"It is easy to use and has a huge community that I can rely on for help. Moreover, it is interactive."
"What I like about RapidMiner is its all-in-one nature, which allows me to prepare, extract, transform, and load data within the same tool."
"Scalability is not really a concern with RapidMiner. It scales very well and can be used in global implementations."
"The challenge lies not in what the tool can do but in how you use it and understand the data."
"The solution can be improved by adding more automated options for reporting."
"When it comes to customer support, we don't always reach the right person. Sometimes, we get junior-level reps who aren't as knowledgeable as we are."
"If there were to be any improvements right now, their documentation needs to get in sync with their product."
"I would like to see all users have access to all of the deep learning models, and that they can be used easily."
"The server product has been getting updated and continues to be better each release. When I started using RapidMiner, it was solid but not easy to set up and upgrade."
"RapidMiner isn't cheap. It's a complete solution, but it's costly."
"I would like to see more integration capabilities."
"In terms of the UI and SaaS, the user interface with KNIME is more appealing than RapidMiner."
"I would appreciate improvements in automation and customization options to further streamline processes."
"Improve the online data services."
"It would be helpful to have some tutorials on communicating with Python."
ibi WebFOCUS is ranked 6th in Predictive Analytics with 18 reviews while RapidMiner is ranked 3rd in Predictive Analytics with 20 reviews. ibi WebFOCUS is rated 8.8, while RapidMiner is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ibi WebFOCUS writes "A flexible mainframe product with unique file features and a rock solid scheduling feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RapidMiner writes "A no-code tool that helps to build machine learning models ". ibi WebFOCUS is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, Databricks and Amazon QuickSight, whereas RapidMiner is most compared with KNIME, Alteryx, Dataiku, Tableau and Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio. See our RapidMiner vs. ibi WebFOCUS report.
See our list of best Predictive Analytics vendors.
We monitor all Predictive Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
