We performed a comparison between IBM App Connect and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."When using IBM stacks, IBM App Connect is suitable and integrates well with other IBM products like WebSphere."
"There is a friendly interface for configuration, and integration is made easy."
"Provides good security features."
"We use IBM App Connect for the integration between the applications."
"It's a powerful application for collaboration. It has many features for customization and integration."
"The solution is fast and supports Open UI 3.0 certification."
"Very scalable, flexible, and user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the user-friendliness of the application."
"It is a stable solution."
"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."
"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"One more important point is that if IBM improves its CI/CD capabilities, it will make a big difference. Right now, I have to create my own CI/CD setup from scratch for every client, which is inefficient."
"IBM App Connect should improve security features."
"When we do a version upgrade of the system, the platform is kind of complicated."
"The product should improve its support."
"More connectors could be available for the product as some of the third-party software doesn't have default connectors."
"IBM App Connect is scalable. From the administration side, they need to improve the RBAC model, as well as the clustering of this product. It will be good if we can start up the cluster, via IBM Connect Console. Some other products like MuleSoft, are providing this type of administration. MuleSoft is easy to use and user friendly."
"The interface could be better."
"The addition of string functionality would be a benefit, particularly in the ESQL space that IBM already uses internally."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."
"The pricing can be improved."
More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM App Connect is ranked 11th in Cloud Data Integration with 21 reviews while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is ranked 14th in Cloud Data Integration with 4 reviews. IBM App Connect is rated 8.2, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM App Connect writes "Offers flexible adapters, good scalability but logging can be difficult at times". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration writes "A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation". IBM App Connect is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, webMethods Integration Server, TIBCO BusinessWorks, IBM InfoSphere DataStage and SAP Process Orchestration, whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is most compared with IBM API Connect, IBM DataPower Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and AWS Glue. See our IBM App Connect vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.