We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support is pleasant to work with and always available."
"It provides value and simplifies processes."
"The initial setup is straightforward and easy. I would give it a nine out of ten."
"IBM BPM and Automation Anywhere working together automate manual tasks with a reduction in FTEs, creating about a 30% reduction in FTEs by automating processes."
"The Process Designer is good. We like how we can drag and drop and link the processes up, that works out great for us."
"Everything is coupled together and comes as one solution."
"One of the most notable things is how you can develop use cases with the customers, internal customers, but directly within. The software process model that BPM supports is really exciting in that aspect."
"We like that it does not require a lot of hours to train our people."
"It is easy and cheap."
"The Workspace is a full, rich application where most users can find what they want. It shows them a list of their work."
"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."
"One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles."
"We have more than 800 distinct applications in our IT landscape. We had enough scalability and okay development cycles, and it has been enough to cover our backup operations and order management systems."
"Our company is based around Oracle processes. It provides a lot of flexibility in its processes."
"The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production."
"It has developmental accelerators, which allow for virtually any customization needs which you may require."
"We would appreciate more user-friendly definitions of processes with a more user-friendly interface for documenting processes."
"From the testing perspective and minor enhancements perspective, customization is something that is a little tedious as compared to new tools. In addition, various open-source tools that are available are not working with IBM BPM."
"IBM BPM needs to have a better and modified interface."
"The configuration is not that easy, and the initial deployment took three months."
"The debugging needs improvement. There is some confusion surrounding the debugging."
"Performance in the development environment space. I know that they have been taking it off the desktop version and putting on the web, and it is not 100% yet."
"The solution can improve integration with SAP, CRM, and Salesforce, which is not capital-intensive."
"When you have to integrate files for enterprise applications."
"From my knowledge of this solution, I don't see that the Oracle BPM includes features such as the growth of discovery and process mining."
"The product must reduce its cost."
"Though Oracle BPM is a stable solution, it's very heavy, so this is one area for improvement. If Oracle can make the components of Oracle BPM lighter, and if the deployment for the solution could be easier, that would make Oracle BPM better."
"Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart."
"Pricing is an area that could use improvement."
"We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues."
"Existing APIs in the product need to be fine-tuned, made more robust and flexible for adoption."
"You have to maintain it manually."
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow and ARIS BPA. See our IBM BPM vs. Oracle BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
