We performed a comparison between IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."
"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."
"The integration of Tenable into our security ecosystem was very good."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."
"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."
"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"The solution must be promoted more in the market."
"It can have more integration."
"The solution must provide penetration testing."
"The price could be lower."
"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."
"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."
More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is ranked 40th in Vulnerability Management with 3 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is rated 6.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment writes "Worthwhile from the regulatory requirements and analytics perspective, but is expensive and not easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Acunetix, Rapid7 InsightVM and Orca Security, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.