We performed a comparison between IBM InfoSphere Optim and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well."
"I feel the solution to be a bit faster than the traditional methods, which makes it easy to customize."
"The job subsystem, monitoring subsystem, alerting, grouping of targets, and reporting features are valuable to us."
"It is the best database management system."
"We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"The solution is easy to use and has good performance."
"I think the look and feel and the accessibility to the databases, the scale of environment support."
"Due to the infrastructure's size, the introduction they offer is very, very useful. It helps with an overall understanding of the product."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Enterprise Manager are the data guide and online monitoring."
"I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases."
"We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than double what we're currently paying. So, it's not really of good value for us."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"My opinion is that this solution needs to improve consolidation. That is what our business needs the most right now."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"The solution is considered expensive."
"We have encountered performance issues when the load is huge."
"It is complicated to run it on Google Chrome."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"I would say mostly backup and recovery, through the Enterprise Manager. Or any corruptions, to be able to fix them through Enterprise Manager."
IBM InfoSphere Optim is ranked 15th in Database Development and Management with 3 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews. IBM InfoSphere Optim is rated 6.6, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Optim writes "Can easily restore the database, but the cost needs to be reduced". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". IBM InfoSphere Optim is most compared with Solix Enterprise Data Management, Informatica Data Archive and Informatica Persistent Data Masking, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases. See our IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager report.
See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.