We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and Katalon Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"The most valuable feature is its automation security capabilities."
"The functionality of the data is very good. You can upload and disperse data using the solution."
"The scalability of the product is good."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is that everything can be managed from one platform."
"User-friendly and a good solution."
"We are now performing automated testing in 15 minutes, which were previously taking a long time when doing it manually."
"The initial setup of Katalon Studio was easy."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is the ease of use of the solution."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"We have been seeing some error pop-ups that are difficult to understand why they were triggered."
"Katalon doesn't support testing of hybrid applications. It's a limitation."
"I can say that in my company, we struggle a lot with iOS automation."
"One improvement would be if it could support more programming languages such as JavaScript or Python. Right now, it is only on Groovy, which I think is not a too popular language."
"One aspect that can be improved is testing for desktop applications. I would like to see them support more technologies in this area."
"Katalon Studio's pricing is expensive."
"Object Spy is brittle. When I try to capture objects, I have to proceed multiple times before it works."
"It seems to lack a few requirements that a typical customer would want. Compared to other solutions, this product is lacking."
IBM DevOps Test UI is ranked 10th in Regression Testing Tools with 8 reviews while Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Regression Testing Tools with 42 reviews. IBM DevOps Test UI is rated 7.2, while Katalon Studio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM DevOps Test UI writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes " Functional automation features and the recording functionality saves time but the performance and script execution is slow ". IBM DevOps Test UI is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, HCL OneTest, Worksoft Certify and OpenText UFT One, whereas Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium. See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Katalon Studio report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.