We performed a comparison between IBM Resilient and SECDO Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Incident Response solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."
"What I like most about IBM Resilient is that it has a complete stack, which means you don't need to use different OEM products because you have all you need under the IBM Resilient umbrella. You don't need to worry much about integrations and components because you're working with tested and proven architecture."
"The solution is reliable in our usage."
"The solution is easy to use."
"IBM Resilient is scalable."
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."
"The product is very good at incident response."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive."
"The ease of deployment is a valuable feature."
"It basically automates the entire alert investigation process."
"IBM Resilient is quite complex, including its configuration."
"The product must provide more integration with other tools."
"The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions."
"The tool needs to improve its documentation on license scripts."
"The response time of the support is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There are shortcomings with IBM Resilient's technical support team that can be considered for improvement in the future."
"Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution."
"Its price needs improvement."
"Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it."
"The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market."
"Maybe the notifications setting could use a simpler setting."
Earn 20 points
IBM Resilient is ranked 4th in Security Incident Response with 17 reviews while SECDO Platform is ranked 10th in Security Incident Response. IBM Resilient is rated 7.6, while SECDO Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SECDO Platform writes "Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth". IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, IBM Security QRadar and Fortinet FortiSOAR, whereas SECDO Platform is most compared with Fortinet FortiSOAR. See our IBM Resilient vs. SECDO Platform report.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.