We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Log correlation is very useful for processing alerts. It serves to follow up alerts in real-time, building an entire workflow."
"It's hard for me to pinpoint any one feature that's most valuable because it is all about consuming logs and analyzing them. We started using QRadar UBA because we needed something that could analyze Linux authentication information. Other products take care of the Windows platform."
"IBM QRadar is great help from its security event monitoring to data center and NOC troubleshooting of issues hard for other departments to spot."
"The ability to transition from microscopic to macroscopic view, instantly, is very good."
"The ability to add extensions is the most valuable feature. For example, extensions that provide valuable test ports."
"IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson is a stable solution."
"The QNI feature is the one I am very interested in, and I have also been interested in Watson. From the log analysis and the security perspective, we are able to dive deep into any of the logs and anomalies."
"In addition to using this solution for our security operations center, we are using it for our other customers."
"We are very happy with the stability of the solution."
"Simplicity is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is its performance and management. Additionally, the solution integrates well."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the alerting based on the security logs."
"The best thing about Kiwi Syslog is that it filters logs into different levels."
"I don't give it a 10 because it is something we have to request. I would love it if UBA was included out of the box like Microsoft."
"GUI needs to be improved."
"They have to build more quantitative monitoring, profiling, and make it more predictive."
"The technical support can be improved a little bit, and the price could be cheaper."
"The features that could be improved include the licensing model and the dashboards and all those presentations. Overall, the user experience part can be improved."
"In a future release, the solution could provide malware analysis."
"AI is superb but need improvements."
"QRadar log integration of various applications can be a tough job at times. There may be occasions when you will not find any QRadar guide on adding logs of a particular application. Even if you come across one, adding a log process is not an easy one."
"I would like to see a more user-friendly and customizable dashboard."
"SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server could improve by reducing the price."
"Technical support could definitely be better."
"I would like to see better search functions and better filters in the next release."
"I would like to have email notifications for emergency logs."
More SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is ranked 32nd in Log Management with 5 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server writes "Shows login failures and server issues but search functions and filters could be improved". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is most compared with syslog-ng, SolarWinds Log Analyzer, Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and ManageEngine Log360. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.