IBM Spectrum Protect vs Iron Mountain Connect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
6,875 views|4,855 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Iron Mountain Logo
378 views|296 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Spectrum Protect and Iron Mountain Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Iron Mountain Connect Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"What I found most valuable in IBM Spectrum Protect is that it allows you to back up physical machines, and its proxy feature lets you back up virtual machines.""The solution can back up every kind of workload in the environment.""With data deduplication and compression, we are reducing our overall storage footprint for our disk histories. Therefore, we are reducing the actual cost of the disk for our data protection and data backups.""We have been using it for several years, and it is quite reliable and predictable. We are quite comfortable with this solution. They're coming up with new features as well. It has good scalability, and it provides good integrations with business-critical applications or databases, such as SAP HANA. It works as expected, and we don't see any issues.""IBM Spectrum Protect is a scalable solution.""Regarding stability, it's been rock solid.""The scalability of IBM Spectrum Protect is good.""The way it covers backup and archive needs. The flexibility of backup copy group always allows me to cover the customer's requests."

More IBM Spectrum Protect Pros →

"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"

More Iron Mountain Connect Pros →

Cons
"I find the Level 1 and Level 2 support spend 80% of the time communicating the same information that I have already provided.""The features should be a little bit closer together.""The software is very complicated. You have to do a lot of configurations to build a server, and you would need to backup and restore.""There is room for improvement in the service aspect.""It does not do too well in our virtual environment.""It would be helpful if the solution included some sort of ransomware protection.""The solution should improve the ability to monitor backup failure.""Easier configuration of some of the products, e.g., VE comes to mind."

More IBM Spectrum Protect Cons →

"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."

More Iron Mountain Connect Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Technical support is pretty good. It is doing fine, but you pay for it."
  • "Licensing can be either complicated or simple depending on what type of licensing you wish to use and what works best for your environment."
  • "At scale, the consumption license (per TB) is very expensive."
  • "Use capacity licensing. It's easier and cheaper."
  • "We worked our licensing into a capacity model, which is nice. Now, everything is much simpler to manage from a licensing perspective.​"
  • "We chose IBM Spectrum Protect, because they actually have something called MSP pricing, which means managed services provider pricing. The pricing was attractive, and it seems to be a platform that IBM is totally investing on in terms of new functions and new capabilities."
  • "Spectrum Protect is not expensive, and it is simple to use."
  • "It is very scalable, but the downside is that it costs money."
  • More IBM Spectrum Protect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Customers need a clearer understanding of how to implement IBM Spectrum. However, issues revolve around financial constraints. If you lack the correct service contract, resolving problems can be… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities
    Top Answer:I would like to see more integration with different platforms, improved stability and security, better protection, more automation, and a more user-friendly experience.
    Top Answer:I primarily use it for various policies related to data, such as data retention, data deletion, and archiving policies. All policies can be set using this system.
    Ranking
    17th
    out of 133 in Backup and Recovery
    Views
    6,875
    Comparisons
    4,855
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    583
    Rating
    7.3
    39th
    out of 133 in Backup and Recovery
    Views
    378
    Comparisons
    296
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    253
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM TSM, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Spectrum Protect (Tivoli Storage Manager) is a data protection platform that gives enterprises a single point of control and administration for backup and recovery. It is the flagship product in the IBM Spectrum Protect (Tivoli Storage Manager) family. It enables reliable, cost effective backups and fast recovery for virtual, physical and cloud environments of all sizes.
    Connected Accounting&ERP is a mid-range accounting program with single user and network editions for Macintosh and Windows operating systems. Connected can be shared concurrently by both Mac OS and Windows users on a single data file. Connected "Core Accounting" consists of the General Ledger, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable modules. Connected "Enterprise" builds on the Core Accounting aspects by adding powerful inventory, job costing, and currency additions. Pricing starts at $399.00.
    Sample Customers
    CERN, Einstein Healthcare, Nyherji, Allianz Australia, TZM, ABT Online, NCT, Kindred Healthcare Inc., Cobalt Iron, TransGrid, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Cash America, Piedmont Healthcare, RWGV, Arkansas Tech University, British Columbia Institute of Technology
    University of La Verne
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    University7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Retailer8%
    Government8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise65%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Iron Mountain Connect
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Iron Mountain Connect and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Spectrum Protect is ranked 17th in Backup and Recovery with 146 reviews while Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews. IBM Spectrum Protect is rated 8.0, while Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Protect writes "Performance and recoveries are better, and customers are happier with performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". IBM Spectrum Protect is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, IBM Spectrum Protect Plus, Commvault Cloud, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and IBM Storage Protect, whereas Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication. See our IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Iron Mountain Connect report.

    See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

    We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.