We performed a comparison between Incredibuild and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."It is saving time for developers, which is saving money for the company."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."
"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."
"I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC."
"It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack."
"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."
"One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies."
"Time to deployment has been reduced in situations where we want to deploy to production or deploy breaking changes."
"It's easy to move to a new release because of templates and meta-runners, and agent pooling."
"Stability could be improved. I don't know the reason for the instability because there are no logs that help me to understand the problem."
"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone) to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly."
"I need some more graphical design."
"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."
"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."
"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."
"If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users."
"Integrating with certain technologies posed challenges related to time and required support from the respective technology teams to ensure smooth integration with TeamCity."
"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."
Earn 20 points
Incredibuild is ranked 20th in Build Automation while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. Incredibuild is rated 8.0, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Incredibuild writes "Saves time for developers, which saves money for the company". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". Incredibuild is most compared with Bazel, Jenkins and GitLab, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Harness and JFrog Pipeline.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.