We performed a comparison between Informatica Data Quality and SAP Information Steward based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Quality solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I do find Informatica Data Quality is stable. It generally maintains a high level of reliability and stability, making it an asset."
"We are able to set rules, establish a data quality management platform, and monitor the quality."
"It is very useful for testing purposes and designing mappings for small projects. If you go for IDQ in the mapping itself, you can see the data. You can then correct it, and test it so easily. It is working fine. It is also stable, scalable, and easy to deploy."
"The profiling feature in Informatica Data Quality is incredibly effective for data governance."
"The most valuable features are data quality, data integrate transformations, match-merge, and a few MDM solutions we build into data quality transformation."
"I like the connectivity and richness of features for the technical team, the maturity of the product, and that it had a cloud version. There is Informatica Cloud, and it is part of the Informatica Cloud platform."
"I give the stability a ten out of ten."
"Seeing the data in the mapping itself is really nice."
"Initial setup was straightforward."
"The most valuable features are data quality insight, metadata management, and metadata dictionary."
"The solution is very fast."
"Data insight is the most valuable feature."
"The data profiling was excellent, as was the ease of generating the dashboards."
"The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits."
"Setup is straightforward."
"Ability to collect information, monitor user access and to plan storage capacity."
"One area that could use improvement is the speed of the web interfaces. At present, they are very slow. I think it is essential that we are original and robust on-premises."
"Although we are very satisfied with the design of the UI, executing tasks with it can be difficult."
"The tools required to migrate existing mappings and server rules through cloud data quality are not available."
"Managing the licenses with the on-premises version was difficult."
"There's certainly room for improvement. One crucial area is generating detailed reports on file statuses. Presently, this is represented visually, often as graphs or charts. Such reporting could offer comprehensive insights into the areas that demand attention and further scrutiny."
"Considering internal data from legacy systems, it is quite difficult to know if Informatica Data Quality meets that high level of accuracy criteria."
"The ability of the product to leverage the power of big data could be improved."
"The customer servive and support could be faster. There is a slow turnaround."
"Performance could be improved."
"Needs to be more powerful on rules."
"A problem with the solution is that it does not allow us to review the results of Information Stewards for other analogies."
"We'd like to see some manipulation techniques included in SAP Information Steward."
"The support team is not very responsive."
"Granularity could be reduced from an application level to the object level."
"The user experience of metapedia could be improved."
"The solution could improve by incorporating other applications, such as Power BI to show more visualization. More interaction with other solutions would be a good benefit."
Informatica Data Quality is ranked 1st in Data Quality with 18 reviews while SAP Information Steward is ranked 7th in Data Quality with 9 reviews. Informatica Data Quality is rated 7.8, while SAP Information Steward is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Quality writes "Offers cloud version, good connectivity and data profiling features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Information Steward writes "Great for collecting, monitoring and planning storage capacity; functionality could be improved". Informatica Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Quality, Talend Data Quality, Trillium Quality, Oracle Data Quality and Ataccama ONE Platform, whereas SAP Information Steward is most compared with SAP Data Services, SAP Data Quality Management, Innovative Systems eLation Platform and Syniti Information Management. See our Informatica Data Quality vs. SAP Information Steward report.
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
