JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Microsoft System Center comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Microsoft System Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is quite stable.""Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications.""The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance.""It's convenient and barebone.""Its technical support is excellent."

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pros →

"I like the automated features of it that let you schedule those updates and the ability of the product to focus on the specific updates, specific platforms, and products that we're interested in keeping up to date.""The features that I have found most valuable are the ease of configuration and the easy discovery of the environment.""Step-by-step documentation that clarifies the implementation procedure.""Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked.""The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it helps us manage our company's application pool, license pool, application update pool, and OS updates.""Good for managing and administering the infrastructure.""It can generate KPIs and management reports with monthly presentations on activities and updating the environment (success and failure).""Managment Packs for Microsoft-specific products, help us implement the best practices for each product."

More Microsoft System Center Pros →

Cons
"This solution needs better management UI.""It's hard to find out the root cause of errors.""Lacks some functional requirements.""A graphic user interface can be added.""Its architecture needs improvement."

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Cons →

"In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times.""Implementation and integration in the case of multi-tenant environments needs improvement.""Could be more user friendly.""The platform performance and responsiveness need improvement. It still demands high computing resources.""The platform's performance could be improved. Additionally, its UI needs to be well-upgraded and work faster.""The solution's dashboard needs improvement.""Something super important that we need is this integration via Intune Configuration Manager.""Most of the documentation is online, however, there are some gaps there. The product documentation still refers back to the 2012 Server. We're pretty much in 2022. There's a ten-year gap there."

More Microsoft System Center Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "It is an open-source solution."
  • More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We maximized our license investment."
  • "It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."
  • "Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."
  • "I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."
  • "I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten means it is expensive."
  • More Microsoft System Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was easy.
    Top Answer:There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten… more »
    Top Answer:For me, the tool's UI seems to be too old. The product's UI needs improvement. The integration features and smoothness of the tool can be improved. Integration can be improved. Maybe Microsoft can… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,755
    Comparisons
    2,422
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    270
    Rating
    9.3
    Views
    273
    Comparisons
    144
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    462
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    JBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP
    MS System Center
    Learn More
    Overview
    Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAP’s architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).
    System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.
    Sample Customers
    APD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank
    Kassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government7%
    Insurance Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Non Tech Company15%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise53%
    Buyer's Guide
    JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews while Microsoft System Center is ranked 14th in Application Infrastructure with 18 reviews. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0, while Microsoft System Center is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center writes "Makes user management and application management easy for users". JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework, Apache Web Server, IBM BPM and NGINX Plus, whereas Microsoft System Center is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite. See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center report.

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.