We performed a comparison between JBoss ESB and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The solution is very easy to use. I can download the trial version and just give it a go."
"We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow."
"The transformation and the data format are the features that I like the most."
"Mule ESB has a user-friendly design, and everything is in one place. The API and architecture are popular right now. Also, MuleSoft has a large and supportive online community."
"I like that it's user-friendly. Compared to other ESBs, I find it easier to use. I like it better than other ESBs. I like the connectors, which make calling the APIs through the routers easier."
"For complex cases, we employ the SSLi engine, whereas for simpler ones like healthcare or response data, such as EDI 270 or 271. We prefer to use an external XRT engine instead of handling it within the ESB for ease of management."
"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave."
"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."
"The most powerful feature is DataWeave, which is a powerful language where data can be transformed from one form into another."
"The EPA, from what I understand, lacks a lot of features and it doesn't really know how to interface with legacy systems or how to develop APIs for legacy systems."
"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."
"Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus."
"The price of Mule ESB could improve."
"We would like to have a built-in logging framework in which we can do auditing."
"Community editions need more attention."
"The current version will not be supported for much longer."
"It should have some amount of logging."
"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."
Earn 20 points
JBoss ESB is ranked 14th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 46 reviews. JBoss ESB is rated 7.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss ESB writes "Easy to use with flexible pricing, but needs more flexibility surrounding integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". JBoss ESB is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Fiorano ESB.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
