We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Has many functionalities including good supervision and workflows."
"The solution's tracking capabilities helped ensure we had full visibility into planned work and scheduled work."
"The way to manage cards as a KANBAN, is really easy but when you need to track hundreds of projects, you need to be very clear in which way the things must be completed."
"The most valuable features of Jira are the dashboards where we see all the features lined up with the release dates in the portfolio view, it is very good."
"The most valuable features of the JIRA Portfolio are the ease of use, many developers are familiar with it."
"The initial setup is simple."
"Jira Portfolio is useful for tracking time and hours. It's easy to manage, create tickets, and change the status of delivery reports. It's not complicated."
"The backlog view feature is highly valuable"
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."
"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."
"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."
"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."
"The solution's tech support is good."
"The solution is sometimes complex to use"
"The team-centric view is slightly weaker in JIRA compared to its competitors, especially considering how I can evaluate how each resource has been placed, not just in one project but across JIRA."
"There should be an integration of efforts between the cloud service providers' side and JIRA Portfolio."
"Learning JIRA is not so easy. There is a learning curve."
"JIRA Portfolio's configuration management could be improved."
"When I want to embed Jira Portfolio in a complete HLI cycle, I'm missing things to evaluate my ethic into my value stream."
"Jira has room for improvement in terms of managing various projects and linking requirements centrally under one project. They could include some add-ons that enable you to link all the requirements and put them into a centralized place. That central place should be restricted to a limited set of users with privileges based on user groups with those rights."
"The initial setup could use improvement."
"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."
More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 55 reviews while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management writes "It helps us track progress and results". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Broadcom Clarity , whereas Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with EcoSys, Microsoft Project Server, Broadcom Clarity , LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal and Artemis Enterprise. See our JIRA Portfolio vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.