We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."
"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."
"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."
"This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated."
"It's stable and reliable."
"Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies."
"The most important feature is its ability to support the technical automation of specific clients that we cannot use with other tools."
"It can provide all levels of testing from design to execution to reporting."
"For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"The low code is the best feature."
"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."
"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."
"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."
"I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."
"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."
"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."
"The scalability is good with Amazon, but IBM had some issues."
"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."
"Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability."
"Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation."
"In terms of areas for improvement, Tricentis has a variety of tools, even its test management tool called qTest. Tricentis Tosca does have integration with different Tricentis tools, but the integration is geared towards a larger organization perspective. For very small organizations that have minimal licenses, the integration needs to be improvised. For example, I belong to a smaller organization that has only one license, so the capability that the tool provides for integration isn't sufficient because my company needs to have separate workspaces. When Tricentis Tosca is going to be running, it is going to use that license, but my company wants another separate workspace to record, relay, and test. This is what my team has been struggling with, and the mechanism is probably there, but that needs more time and investigation, so I can't say that I'm one hundred percent certain that Tricentis Tosca, in terms of integration for a smaller organization is insufficient. Another area for improvement is that Tricentis Tosca is currently just a Windows-based tool which affects the market because nowadays, Windows isn't the only operating system, for example, there's also Apple or IOS that's moving much faster than Windows."
"The solution is expensive compared to other tools in the market."
"A disadvantage of Tricentis Tosca is that you have to customize it according to your need, during the early stages of the software, particularly during upstream testing, before system and unit testing."
"The main area where there is room for improvement is how they do upgrades. Going through this current upgrade, we were delayed a month because we are using a third-party tool. It's called Tosca Connect by Tasktop. When this latest upgrade broke that relationship between the two, it took Tricentis a month to come back with a workable solution... Their whole upgrade process needs to be better and cleaner, from an end-user standpoint."
"Tricentis Tosca's performance could be better. Sometimes when we are remapping or when it is loading it can take a lot of time. There are free solutions that have better performance in this area."
"Tricentis Tosca’s technical support could be improved."
LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 22 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 98 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 8.8, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Perfecto and Bitbar, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim. See our LambdaTest vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.