MariaDB vs Percona Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MariaDB Logo
7,195 views|6,415 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Percona Logo
1,793 views|1,672 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MariaDB and Percona Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Open Source Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed MariaDB vs. Percona Server Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product has been stable and reliable.""It is a stable solution.""It is very simple to install, and the commands are exactly the same as MySQL.""We use MariaDB for identity provider services. Most of the things that we are doing are deployed in the container mode. All such solutions require a database, and MariaDB is easier to use for these kinds of deployments.""The speed and functionality are the most valuable features.""MariaDB can solve things better than MySQL. Maria DB has better performance than MySQL.""The solution has PL/SQL compatibility.""The integration with other products is seamless."

More MariaDB Pros →

"We find the product mostly stable."

More Percona Server Pros →

Cons
"An improvement would be scaling it up to the levels of Oracle, especially when it comes to resilience, so that we can do higher transactions for two databases or power our operation.""The scaling for database online transactions needs improvement.""The solution can improve by having support for more integration. However, at this time it is working well for us.""Integration with AWS could be improved.""The solution is not scalable.""The performance could be a bit better.""I’m not sure if it can scale.""MariaDB could be improved by adding more automation."

More MariaDB Cons →

"If Percona had flashback capabilities, it would be ideal."

More Percona Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of this solution represents a very good compromise between the cost and what it offers."
  • "It's an open-source solution."
  • "The licensing cost is approximately $4000.00 per year and the licensing is based on the software and the number of posts that you make."
  • "I used the open-source version, which is available free of charge."
  • "This is an open-source product, which can be used free of charge."
  • "This is an open source solution with no licensing fees."
  • "MariaDB is open-source and self-hosted."
  • "When it comes to MariaDB, it should have a more cost-effective license."
  • More MariaDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The integration with other products is seamless.
    Top Answer:We are facing some deadlock issues when the nodes get rebooted. There is not much support available. The support must be improved. The downtime is more. It takes us time to restore production. There… more »
    Top Answer:We find the product mostly stable.
    Top Answer:This is an open-source product and is free to use.
    Top Answer:I would love to see the flashback in Percona MySQL or even in Percona PostgreSQL. It's available in Oracle, the flashback. In Oracle, there's the utility of a flashback. It stores all the information… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    7,195
    Comparisons
    6,415
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    451
    Rating
    8.0
    9th
    Views
    1,793
    Comparisons
    1,672
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    884
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    MariaDB
    Video Not Available
    Percona
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    MariaDB is an open source relational database created by the original founders of MySQL. It is considered one of the most popular and trusted database servers throughout the world. MariaDB is a valued component found in most cloud offerings and is the default in many Linux tools. It is also widely used by Wikipedia, WordPress, and Google, among other well-known sites. Maria DB easily melds data into concise information from a vast array of applications, such as banking, online shopping, websites, and more.

    MariaDB was originally created to improve MySQL performance. It is the most widely chosen database server due to the solution being super fast, robust, user-friendly, and easily scalable. MariaDB also offers a substantial ecosystem of plugins, storage engines, and numerous other valuable tools that make it very attractive for a significant offering of use cases.

    The solution’s newest functionalities include compatibility with Oracle Database and Temporal Data Tables, and advanced clustering with Galera Cluster 4, which make it easier for users to research data history from any point in the past. Additionally, the most recent versions include JSON and GIS features. MariaDB is committed to staying an open source solution.

    MariaDB Features

    • More storage: MariaDB works with more storage engines than MySQL and most other database servers available. Some storage options include, but are not limited to ARCHIVE, MERGE, CSV, MEMORY, BLACKHOLE, MyISAM, ColumnStore, MyRocks, and Cassandra.

    • Super fast: MariaDB offers faster authentication checks. The FlushSSL permits SSL certificates to be reloaded without a server restart, resulting in huge time savings.

    • Improved testing: MariaDB offers an extending testing suite that runs faster and can test more than ever before. Bugs can be easily fixed and invalid tests removed.

    • Genuinely open source: Every code in MariaDB is GPL, LGPL, or BSD. Client libraries [for Windows (ODBC), Java (JDBC), or C] allow linking to closed source software. All fixed bug cases and development plans are completely public. MariaDB is a community-developed solution representing the true spirit of open source products.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Faustine C., Engineering Supervisor- Corporate Data Solutions and Services at TZ Telecoms Corporation, shares, “The software provides a lot of information on what is happening inside the database. For most performance parameters it is easy to know if something is not right in the configuration or optimization which helps engineers take remedial fine-tuning measures. For example, if the database is underperforming it is easy to know which performance parameter can be adjusted to handle the workload. It is difficult to troubleshoot database issues if many performance parameters can not be monitored or debugged which is the case with some database management systems. It provides great monitoring of data storage, processing, and performance stability which is really important for real-time data storage and processing. It's a user-friendly product.”

    A PeerSpot user who is a Senior Engineer at a tech services company relates, “ The solution's high availability is its most valuable aspect. We have found the product to be stable and the initial setup is pretty simple. I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten. I'm very happy with it overall. I would recommend the solution to others. It's easy to find details about the product online and to learn about it.”

    Percona Server for MySQL is a free, fully compatible, enhanced, open source drop-in replacement for MySQL that provides good performance, scalability and instrumentation. With over 3,000,000 downloads, Percona Server for MySQL's self-tuning algorithms and support for extremely high-performance hardware delivers excellent performance and reliability.
    Sample Customers
    Google, Wikipedia, Tencent, Verizon, DBS Bank, Deutsche Bank, Telefónica, Huatai Securities
    Pricefalls Marketplace, Micpoint, Rent the Runway, Transmart, Wattpad, Singular Group, Invoca, 3E
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Educational Organization8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Media Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    MariaDB vs. Percona Server
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MariaDB vs. Percona Server and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    MariaDB is ranked 4th in Open Source Databases with 52 reviews while Percona Server is ranked 9th in Open Source Databases with 2 reviews. MariaDB is rated 8.2, while Percona Server is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of MariaDB writes "Easy to deploy, cost-effective, and integrates seamlessly with other products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Percona Server writes "Open-source and free to use with a good community". MariaDB is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, Firebird SQL, PostgreSQL and Amazon Aurora, whereas Percona Server is most compared with MySQL, EDB Postgres Advanced Server, PostgreSQL and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. See our MariaDB vs. Percona Server report.

    See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.