We performed a comparison between MariaDB and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I am editing."
"We like the easy way that we can collect data from other databases."
"A valuable feature is that we can use it for quite a few things, all the things you'd expect from a server—along the lines of Linux's Lightweight Directory."
"The performance is very good."
"The solution is very easy to implement."
"I would say that for most use cases it works fine."
"MariaDB has a straightforward initial setup with easy-to-understand documentation."
"The documentation is quite straightforward."
"SAP HANA is vertically and horizontally scalable."
"Using this solution has given us better details for reporting and analytics."
"SAP HANA's interface is pretty user-friendly."
"The feature that I like the most is that we can transport the data to our web data application. SAP HANA's performance is really perfect. We're working on big data, and SAP HANA is really working on high performance. We are happy working with it."
"We appreciate that the current, redesigned version of this solution that is much more straightforward for new users, and has been well thought out with industry best practice standards in mind."
"It's easy to use, and the Hana Studio is pretty good."
"Some functions have good performance."
"In comparison with other DMS solutions, it offers good performance."
"There is not much support available."
"MariaDB could be improved by adding more automation."
"The solution can improve by having support for more integration. However, at this time it is working well for us."
"Data continuity could be improved."
"The interface should be more user-friendly. It should be able to connect directly to the database and Interact with it without having to use commands. It needs better integration."
"I’m not sure if it can scale."
"I would like to see a better user interface which would make the tool less complex."
"Master-master replication is something that needs to be simplified."
"The solution's development platform should be more flexible and scalable to adapt to other solutions."
"SAP HANA is not strong like Oracle when it comes to finance. They are only strong with the logistic business project."
"The pricing is expensive."
"The user experience should be better. Its user interface is not good. I also don't like the transition concept."
"The SAP ERP processes are quite complex and it can be challenging."
"The product is very demanding on memory requirements."
"The surface side or Attack dashboard needs improvement because there are some gaps after sales services."
"The pricing could be better."
MariaDB is ranked 5th in Relational Databases Tools with 52 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. MariaDB is rated 8.2, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of MariaDB writes "Easy to deploy, cost-effective, and integrates seamlessly with other products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". MariaDB is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, Firebird SQL, PostgreSQL and Oracle Database In-Memory, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and IBM Cloud Pak for Data. See our MariaDB vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.