We performed a comparison between Meraki Dashboard and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"What I love most about the Meraki Dashboard are its user-friendly features."
"The most valuable feature is its simplicity in navigating through the dashboard. It's well set out, and the layout is nice and user friendly. A lot of clients enjoy seeing layer 7 visibility. They get a good indication and insight into what is happening in their network and what applications are being used the most. They can then customize and give preference to business-critical applications."
"Meraki dashboard deserves an Oscar."
"An excellent dashboard that is currently unique in covering both SD-WAN and SD-LAN with built-in security."
"I would say the ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very easy to set up and get up and running."
"The ease-of-use and the analytics are really effective tools."
"The most valuable feature is the single pane of glass that gives you multisite visibility."
"We greatly utilize the network because we can plug it into the DNS, VPN, or equipment. It's very good. Meraki Dashboard enhances wireless network management. We appreciate its flexibility, as it allows for easy suite configuration. We can handle everything on there when there's a policy or any other requirement."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."
"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."
"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."
"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."
"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."
"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."
"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"I am concerned about the fact that once your licensing expires the devices stop working and become a brick."
"Meraki Dashboard could improve the user interface by making it more user-friendly. The configuring can at times be difficult."
"Meraki lacks their own software for connecting to the VPN which creates some issues."
"There are some issues with the NAT configuration, it is now impossible to some operations with the solution."
"When users are trying to roam from one location to another location, geographical tracking would be helpful."
"The cost of the solution is high and can be improved."
"The wait time to speak with a Meraki support engineer is always long, but they get the job done."
"We would like to be able to test the health of WAN connections."
"We haven't seen an ROI."
"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."
"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."
"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."
"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly."
"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."
"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."
"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Meraki Dashboard is ranked 9th in Network Monitoring Software with 51 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. Meraki Dashboard is rated 8.6, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Meraki Dashboard writes "Incredibly easy to use, great troubleshooting and prevention of malicious events". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". Meraki Dashboard is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds NPM, ThousandEyes, Mist AI and Cloud and Zabbix, whereas Statseeker is most compared with . See our Meraki Dashboard vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
