We performed a comparison between MHR iTrent and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud HCM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."MHR iTrent's functionality and the payroll part are good."
"The retrospection feature within iTrent is really good and better than what some other software provides. It's really useful."
"We have features such as ABKRS based on the client's requirement, tariff and TMSTA, and so on."
"SAP HCM has valuable features for analytics data management."
"The master data where most of the reports were run from was the most valuable. We were quite satisfied with this module."
"All our employee data, like performance and payroll, is managed through SAP HCM."
"They provide the most stable and powerful technology in the areas of human resources, information systems, and ERP."
"It has the best data management features."
"The tool's most valuable features for our HR operations include easy reporting capabilities, which allow us to generate reports for management meetings and auditing purposes. Additionally, it supports appointment preparation and processing benefits."
"We've found that the solution has the capability to scale."
"MHR's customer service needs to improve. It's dreadful at the moment. They're not very customer-focused."
"Customer support and getting help from MHR iTrent are not great at all."
"HCM could improve compatibility, making it more accessible via web applications and graphical interfaces."
"The product's license is very expensive."
"This solution needs to be more configurable and user-friendly."
"The solution is rather expensive."
"The limitation of HCM compared to new-era human capital management solutions is the cost."
"SAP HCM cannot integrate with other third-party applications. One of the drawbacks we encounter with SAP HCM, specifically in payroll management, is the limitation regarding changing payroll areas within the same month. For instance, if an employee transitions from staff to non-staff status during the month, we face difficulties because the system doesn't allow us to change the payroll."
"A better user interface and greater AI integration are crucial."
"The current platform is quite rigid and not as flexible and end-user friendly as other HR solutions."
MHR iTrent is ranked 23rd in Cloud HCM with 2 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 3rd in Cloud HCM with 48 reviews. MHR iTrent is rated 4.6, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of MHR iTrent writes "A scalable solution with good functionalities, but customer support needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Allows you to generate reports, easy integration and offers out-of-the-box support". MHR iTrent is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud and Workday, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and PeopleStrong . See our MHR iTrent vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Cloud HCM vendors and best Benefits Administration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud HCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.