Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution can scale to fit any requirement.""I like that we can copy and download data using Azure. It's not just for file storage; we can also use it for large data sets or to host static web applications.""The most valuable aspect of Azure File Storage is that all the features are available in one place.""The tool offers a secure way to access storage. You can also easily share the files securely across Azure.""The initial setup is fairly easy.""I like that Microsoft Azure File Storage works fine and is quick to deploy. It's also easy to connect to it, particularly when connecting it with my on-premise file servers.""The profile management option is another valuable feature that allows us to manage the profiles and secure them.""The solution is user-friendly and integrates easily with web apps."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pros →

"The interface is good.""It's a scalable product.""Replication and performance tuning are valuable features.""The backup is reliable and intuitive.""The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background.""From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.""Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven.""The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."

More Oracle Database Backup Service Pros →

Cons
"A lot of things could be better, especially when it comes to accessing File Storage for monitoring. Azure Copy is fine, but there could be additional integration and security features for those who want more privacy and control over access to Azure.""Microsoft Azure File Storage is not that easy to use.""The product name keeps changing. It can be confusing when product names change frequently, especially with Microsoft. Sometimes, if you refer to a product by a certain name last year, it might have a different name six months later.""The solution should support all the legacy storage systems.""The provider needs to collect more information about the products.""Sometimes it takes very long to refresh the information.""It’s a challenge to find the right support person.""It's a bit complex to set up. Other than that, there is nothing to improve."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Cons →

"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups.""The solution needs to add an archive function.""Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined.""We cannot use the product with other brands.""Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution.""They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment.""It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed.""The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."

More Oracle Database Backup Service Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
  • "One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
  • "The price is comparable to other competitive solutions."
  • "There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."
  • "I give the pricing of the solution a seven out of ten."
  • "One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."
  • More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."
  • "Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."
  • "The platform is expensive."
  • "The platform is expensive."
  • "The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."
  • More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This… more »
    Top Answer:The price could be reduced. The tiered pricing model is good. The solution is a bit pricey compared to AWS and Google. We pay as we use.
    Top Answer:From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.
    Top Answer:The pricing must be improved. The only problem with Oracle is its pricing.
    Top Answer:The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it. One simple update can mess up the entire system.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,729
    Comparisons
    4,664
    Reviews
    34
    Average Words per Review
    401
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    698
    Comparisons
    586
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    283
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Azure File Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

    Key scenarios:

    • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
    • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
    • Integrate modern applications with File storage
    • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

    Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

    Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

    Sample Customers
    Talon, Camden
    Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Construction Company19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business78%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 44 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 Glacier and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Wasabi and Amazon S3 Glacier. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.