We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is its ease of use."
"You can peer into different levels of the archive."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Object Storage for us is its simplicity and reliability as a storage solution."
"The solution integrates well with Microsoft Office 365 and includes important features such as SIEM, storage, SQL, and Cosmos DB."
"What I like most about Microsoft Azure Object Storage is that you have many ways to access it."
"It is easy to use, and we use it for backup and remote desktop access. It is working fine."
"The reason is that I believe they only offer the corporate interface we use, and perhaps they should consider creating a historical customer interface. I haven't created a virtual machine; instead, I've established a personal GED. This allows me to provide customers with the necessary role functions, enabling them to download files without incurring excessive costs."
"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."
"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."
"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."
"Azure's technical support could be better - they take a long time to respond, and issues get transferred to multiple engineers, so you have to repeat the whole story every time without getting any proper resolution."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward. It would be best if you had a little bit of training or an understanding of the concepts. It's important because if you don't do that, then you might end up not following the best practices. Then you will learn it the hard way by making mistakes and then know that you shouldn't have done this or that. It's better to attend workshops and take a hands-on approach."
"Object re-use should be improved in order to get better performance and reduce the cost."
"We experienced an outage issue recently, which affected its overall stability and reliability."
"The stability could be improved."
"They could provide multiple tools to provide you with cost calculations, giving you a better picture or providing better details of the cost calculations over the years."
"The solution needs to improve the custom domain integration with static web pages. Even though Blog Storage is providing the static content hosting feature, due to the custom domain availability, the integration is not available. In most cases, we withdraw from that service and use our app service to host our static data feeds."
"The tool should be a little bit cheaper."
"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."
"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."
"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 10th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 45 reviews while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 8.0, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Can be used to safely store big datasets in the cloud at a reasonable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service, Google Cloud Storage and Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store). See our Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
