We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Pantheon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool’s stability is good."
"The robust encryption services increase the confidence of tech users."
"The solution is easy to use and flexible."
"Microsoft Azure has proven to be beneficial for our organization due to its quick deployment capabilities. Setting up virtual machines or any required infrastructure is fast."
"The most valuable feature is the virtual machine."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure is its ease of use."
"Microsoft Azure has a large scope, it can do many things."
"Virtual machine services, in SaaS services, M365, and Data Lake are all popular with our clients."
"The product allows users to create multiple development environments."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"Improving transparency in billing is crucial for us. Understanding how billing works only becomes clear once we start using the services. A more accurate billing calculator would help us anticipate costs associated with using specific services."
"With Microsoft, our only concern is exchange rates because we're paying in dollars. It's very expensive for us because of the exchange rates. It would help if they partnered with someone locally so we can pay in our local currency."
"The interface for configuring the environment is not very intuitive. Certain things are at different places, and it is not easy to navigate. They should have a more transparent licensing model. Currently, Microsoft's licensing is a bit clunky, and it keeps changing depending on the type of subscription you have. Different features are included, and sometimes, it is very hard to figure out the right licensing. So, the commercial aspect of the licensing can be improved, and they can make it easier to understand all the features that are included."
"There is a need to be better on-premise solutions that are more helpful. However, I don't think that is the goal of Microsoft Azure. They want the solution to be secure cloud solutions with cloud applications. This is their main goal at the moment."
"Microsoft Azure needs to be simplified to make it better understood for users."
"Virtual networks might be improved by adding more rules for the validation of protocols and peripheral elements in security assurance."
"I'd like to see better integration with S/4HANA integrated and other services, like monitoring, for example."
"Azure calculator could be improved, there are issues with login synchronization."
"The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in PaaS Clouds with 299 reviews while Pantheon is ranked 20th in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Pantheon is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pantheon writes "The product is user-friendly and performs well, but it is very costly compared to other tools". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Pantheon is most compared with Amazon AWS, Acquia Cloud, SAP Cloud Platform, GoDaddy and Cloudways. See our Microsoft Azure vs. Pantheon report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.