We performed a comparison between Microsoft Intune and OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Configuration Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"We have found the solution is capable of scaling."
"It has a useful device management feature."
"The stability of Microsoft Intune is good."
"The biggest benefits of Intune are the ability to push changes and the added security. When we moved forward with Defender, we onboarded all those machines automatically. That helps dramatically. For a while, we were left with machines that weren't protected. We could see where people had done things they shouldn't have done, and Defender saved our skins a few times. It didn't happen a lot, but it happened enough that it made us glad we made that decision."
"For Windows services, there are multiple options within Intune to modernize it to be more internet-facing and dynamic."
"This product works very well for companies already using the full Microsoft suite."
"It is a comprehensive security solution that not only controls access to enterprise resources but also tracks and prevents unauthorized access, ensuring the protection of sensitive data and preventing potential data loss scenarios."
"Helps me perform changes in connected infrastructure thanks to the discovery features."
"The most valuable feature is the impact analysis."
"Technical support is not that great."
"In future releases, I would like to see better integration with Apple products."
"There can be more logs. I do not have any other requirements."
"I would like to see the ability to deploy custom packages as a Windows 64-bit package, as opposed to the Windows 32-bit, which is the only one available now."
"Areas for improvement in Intune include expanding support beyond Samsung devices to accommodate other Android manufacturers like Redmi and Motorola."
"Integration with Mac devices requires some improvement."
"Microsoft Intune lags market leaders, such as Apperian, in its MAM capabilities."
"In the past, I raised some tickets for the enhancement feature, which was missing in Intune."
"The native UI should be simplified because it is outdated and a little bit over-complicated."
More OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Intune is ranked 3rd in Configuration Management with 166 reviews while OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is ranked 20th in Configuration Management. Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0, while OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management writes "It allows us to deploy applications and primitive desktops globally. The upgrade cycle is very long". Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Entra ID and SOTI MobiControl, whereas OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager. See our Microsoft Intune vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management report.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.