• Home
  • Microsoft Virtual Server vs. VMware ThinApp

Microsoft Virtual Server vs VMware ThinApp comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
Microsoft Virtual Server
Read 35 Microsoft Virtual Server reviews
227 views|53 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
VMware ThinApp
Read 3 VMware ThinApp reviews
1,406 views|682 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Virtual Server vs. VMware ThinApp
May 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Virtual Server and VMware ThinApp based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Virtualization solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Virtual Server vs. VMware ThinApp Report (Updated: May 2024).
Download the complete report
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
WILSON KEREBEI
Provides an ease of navigation, but the deployment process poses a few challenges
The platform’s value lies in the outsourcing of concerns related to infrastructure management. It allows us to redirect our focus toward managing... Read more →
Anonymous User
Streamlines checking our app after pushing an update, which helps cut costs
In the past we used multiple servers to load-balance the application and when we pushed updates to the application we would need to check it on all... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of this product could be better."
  • "It is an expensive product."
  • "The solution has a yearly license. If we switch to a yearly subscription plan for Microsoft Virtual Server, it would be cheaper in the long run. The price per month would be higher, but the overall cost for the year would be lower."
  • "The solution is very expensive."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "There is no need for me to pay anything towards the solution's licensing costs."
  • "Some of the licensing costs are monthly, and others are yearly."
  • "The cost can also be optimized by changing the size of the implementation."

    • More Microsoft Virtual Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Microsoft Virtual Server?
    Top Answer:The solution is easy to manage.
    Read all 16 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Virtual...
    Top Answer:Microsoft Virtual Server is a low-cost solution.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Microsoft Virtual Server?
    Top Answer:Customization must be improved. The tool must provide more freedom to the customer.
    Read all 16 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 9 in Application Virtualization
    Views
    227
    Comparisons
    53
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    288
    Rating
    8.2
    4th
    out of 9 in Application Virtualization
    Views
    1,406
    Comparisons
    682
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Virtual Server, MS Virtual Server
    ThinApp
    Learn More
    Microsoft
    VMware
    Overview
    The most cost-effective server virtualization technology is now available as a free download. Virtual Server is a key component of any server consolidation strategy. Increase hardware utilization and cut power costs while enabling your organization to rapidly configure and deploy new servers.
    VMware ThinApp accelerates application deployment and simplifies application migration with agentless application virtualization. Deploy ThinApp packages on "locked-down" PCs and allow end users to run their favorite applications without compromising security. ThinApp eliminate application conflicts by isolating applications from each other and the underlying OS into a single executable file that can be easily deployed to many endpoints.
    Sample Customers
    Paylocity, ASELSAN, Sochi Organizing Committee, Supervisor of Elections, Orange County, Florida, Netgem, Nav Canada, The British & Irish Lions
    Delhi International Airport, Telus Communications Company, Mansfield District Council, St Edmunds College, Sydney Adventist Hospital, ITSAM, Hertz International, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. , ASVZ, Appenzell Ausserrhoden Informatik, MTF, Stadt Hattingen, €sterreichisches Verkehrsbªro AG, DER Reisebªro GmbH & Co OHG, Thomas-Krenn.AG, BFI Wien, Metal One Pipe & Tubular Products Inc., NTT Neomeit
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government8%
    Educational Organization7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business49%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Virtual Server vs. VMware ThinApp
    May 2024
    Free Report: Microsoft Virtual Server vs. VMware ThinApp
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Virtual Server vs. VMware ThinApp and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Virtual Server is ranked 3rd in Application Virtualization with 35 reviews while VMware ThinApp is ranked 4th in Application Virtualization. Microsoft Virtual Server is rated 8.2, while VMware ThinApp is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Virtual Server writes "Easy to use but challenges with desktop version and lags ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware ThinApp writes "Streamlines checking our app after pushing an update, which helps cut costs". Microsoft Virtual Server is most compared with , whereas VMware ThinApp is most compared with Microsoft App-V, Numecent, Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and Inuvika. See our Microsoft Virtual Server vs. VMware ThinApp report.

    See our list of best Application Virtualization vendors.

    We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.