We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It saves time as tasks are automated."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."
"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"K2 is reasonably priced."
"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 56th in Business Process Management (BPM). Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our Nintex Process Platform vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.