We performed a comparison between Nutanix AHV Virtualization and Odin Virtuozzo Containers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."This solution is very stable and it has been running for the last three months, with no issues."
"The initial setup of Nutanix AHV Virtualization is straightforward."
"Integration is the most valuable feature of the product."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix AHV Virtualization is the user-friendly environment. The integration, implementation, and training for the solution are good."
"The dashboard of the solution is one of its strongest points."
"Nutanix AHV's most valuable feature is NetFlow."
"The most valuable feature is manageability."
"Nutanix is good for new implementations on the VM side. It's very good for disaster recovery and final storage."
"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"If you want to install a specific operating system, you must first check to see if it is listed in the compatibility list; only then will you be able to install it, and that is one issue for now."
"If we have to opt for a high level of capacity planning and need more analytics—like deciding on new purchases or budgeting, or if we need additional resources in the near future—we need to pay for Prism Central. I would suggest that Nutanix improve a bit on the analytics part of Prism Element so we can calculate those kinds of things within that flavor."
"To face no complications in our company, we had to switch off virtual machines one after the other before heading to Nutanix platform and going to edge services to switch off and turn off everything, making it a challenging process for me."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see support for containerization."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"The solution could improve the call logging system to HPE, it is a bit tedious."
"My storage use is doubled; if I am creating a one TB virtual machine then my storage policy will take two TB from my cluster."
"The solution is very expensive."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is ranked 5th in Server Virtualization Software with 48 reviews while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 12th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews. Nutanix AHV Virtualization is rated 8.6, while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix AHV Virtualization writes "Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". Nutanix AHV Virtualization is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, KVM and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), whereas Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, KVM and VMware vSphere.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.