We performed a comparison between Nutanix Disaster Recovery and VMware SRM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Nutanix Disaster Recovery can be used for snapshots, backup, and disaster recovery."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is the reliability and scalability of being able to swing our workloads across the country."
"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."
"The product is very simple and very easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the automation, where you press a button and everything fails over seamlessly."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the automatic recovery of the virtual machine if it goes down."
"The solution is simple to use and has effective automation."
"My impression is that the initial setup process is relatively straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with our Nutanix environment."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that you can independently run the disaster recovery without disturbing the production instances."
"In terms of resiliency, the most valuable aspect of SRM has been its effectiveness."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the integration part, along with the subsequent hardware."
"The solution should include a standard license for the object level and file level."
"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."
"The solution's bandwidth utilization can be improved further."
"The product must allow users to create a production domain on the main site in one hypervisor and a backup site on another."
"Timing issues arise due to replication lags in multiple areas. When this happens, we encounter errors."
"The interface is not easy to use and can be made more user-friendly."
"The solution could improve by removing some of the limitations we have been facing. There could be better integrated."
"The back sites sometimes are very, very complicated."
"The solution currently has a five-minute RPO, meaning if the VM goes down we can lose up to five minutes of data which is a big deal when it relates to database replication."
"Currently, there is a limitation of consolidating only 15 sites per SRM."
"Flexibility to choose different PITs would be nice."
"The primary site lacks adequate equipment, such as power backup and cooling, which can lead to downtime during issues like power outages or overheating."
Nutanix Disaster Recovery is ranked 16th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 4 reviews while VMware SRM is ranked 6th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 73 reviews. Nutanix Disaster Recovery is rated 9.4, while VMware SRM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix Disaster Recovery writes "A reliable and scalable solution that can be used to ensure workloads are replicated when needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SRM writes "A scalable solution that integrates well with the VMware platform, but its platform agnostics do not support on-cloud usage". Nutanix Disaster Recovery is most compared with Zerto, whereas VMware SRM is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, Azure Site Recovery and NAKIVO Backup & Replication. See our Nutanix Disaster Recovery vs. VMware SRM report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.