We performed a comparison between OmniPeek and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"It's a solid piece of software. It's stable."
"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek was the ability it gave us to see the connection procedure."
"I believe the most crucial feature of OmniPeek search is the ability to sniff packets based on channel switching."
"The most valuable feature is OmniPeek is user-friendly."
"The most valuable features are the voice bot, which checks the quality of service for voice, and the expert view that gives me insight on what and where to troubleshoot."
"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek is the ability to assign custom color codes to the different packets easily."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."
"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."
"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."
"This solution allowed us to track down trouble users."
"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."
"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"I would like to see the tool work in an open environment the same as how it does in a closed environment."
"I don't see a clear roadmap in the future for improving this software."
"I would like to see the saving feature improved. We have had issues if you do not save your progress then you have to start from the beginning."
"Making it more clear on how to configure the filters, or really automating them, would be an improvement."
"I am not using OmniPeek for automation, we only do manual testing. Automation testing is tedious to do. The automation should be more user-friendly. I have exposed some APIs but the usage is not user-friendly."
"The solution's automation has room for improvement."
"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."
"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."
"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."
"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."
"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."
"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
OmniPeek is ranked 38th in Network Monitoring Software with 6 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. OmniPeek is rated 7.8, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OmniPeek writes "Easy to identify packets, beneficial color assigning, and responsive support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". OmniPeek is most compared with LiveAction LiveNX, Colasoft Capsa and LogicMonitor, whereas Statseeker is most compared with . See our OmniPeek vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.