We performed a comparison between Oracle Content Management and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"SharePoint enabled the staff to share documents and work on a document simultaneously."
"It is well supported by Microsoft."
"The access control is definitely a good feature. We also appreciate the improvements they've made to the online applications, where multiple users can work on the same documents simultaneously. Everything syncs automatically."
"Its configuration management ability is critical for document-based systems."
"Tech support tops off as excellent."
"Helps with document collaboration and workflow."
"It is very stable."
"The ability to take Excel files and make them dynamic SharePoint lists with instant reporting capabilities has been a major benefit."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
"You still need a bit of expertise to add branding."
"We'd like to be able to upload from MS Excel to deploy tasks and use drop-down lists to collect further information."
"The management of the product/back-end is complex."
"The solution lacks collaboration features."
"During uptime under our network, it is hard to find info when content is hefty."
"Integration needs to be more straightforward, particularly with Azure. SharePoint also needs a more comprehensive introductory course for users."
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."
"There's a challenge with desktop applications synchronizing with online documents in real-time. If someone is working on a document in the desktop version of Excel, for example, and someone else is editing the same document online, the changes won't sync immediately. That's the only real challenge we've encountered."
Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 150 reviews. Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive, Alfresco and OpenText Extended ECM, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Box. See our Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.