We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services."
"There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"Service Bus is good at routing the transformation."
"The most valuable feature is the adapters."
"The communication between applications is already defined, which means that you don't have to redefine your service infrastructure at the lower level."
"The routing and aggregation are the most valuable features. It's split and join."
"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."
"The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default setting."
"Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly."
"This solution's adaptability to our use case has helped us integrate our systems seamlessly."
"With a premium, one can get support 24 hours."
"I found it was quite easy to set up and implement."
"More than a feature, I would say that the reliability of the platform is the most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable part of Fuse is the fact that it's based on Red Hat Apache Camel. It is really good that it already comes with so many different connectors. That makes it relatively easy to use. We use their XML definition to define the routes, making it really easy to define the routing."
"The solution has more tooling and options."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"There are some loopholes in service and support."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"What needs improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the connectivity between adapters such as the Salesforce adapter and database adapters. The limited number of adapters compatible with Oracle Service Bus makes you want to switch to a different solution."
"The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations."
"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"Security features can be improved to better protect the server."
"The main issue with Red Hat Fuse is the outdated and scattered documentation."
"While it's a good platform, the pricing is a bit high."
"There is definitely a bit of a learning curve."
"Red Hat is not easy to learn. You can learn it but you sometimes need external expertise to implement solutions."
"The monitoring experience should be better."
"What needs to be improved in Red Hat Fuse is on the development side because when you use it for development purposes, it lacks a user interface compared to what MuleSoft has, so it's a bit difficult for users."
"The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower."
"The documentation for Fuse can be improved because, while it is very detailed and extensive, it is not too intuitive for someone that has to deliver some kind of troubleshooting services. In particular, for installation, re-installation, or upgrades, I find that the documentation can be improved."
Oracle Service Bus is ranked 6th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews. Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, JBoss ESB and webMethods Integration Server. See our Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.