We performed a comparison between OutSystems and SAP Mobile Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides for faster development and better software releases."
"I find it to be a genuinely cool and effective platform for my development needs."
"The technical support is perfect."
"OutSystems is a low-code solution. Most features are like drag-and-drop, so it's pretty easy to work. Thus it helps the organization by saving time for developers."
"I like the mobile features the most, and there are also various features around the portal we created that I enjoy."
"The most important features of this tool are its visual modeling capabilities and drag and drop functionality. You can see what you are coding which makes it easy to understand and maintain. They have also created a big revolution in digital transformation by introducing native mobile app development under the same IDE."
"Their out-of-the-box UI is quite good."
"OutSystems' low-cost approach has positively impacted our productivity, because we were able to develop faster with OutSystems, enabling us to implement many changes during our sprint."
"Technical support is helpful."
"One valuable feature of SAP Mobile Platform is its enterprise-grade standard and maintained APIs, available out of the box for easy integration with various systems."
"It's not that difficult to set up."
"Both platforms, the SAP Mobile Platform, and SAP, are highly valuable for our company because they facilitate integration, which can be expensive. It's very convenient to connect and create billing accounts through the SAP Mobile Platform."
"The initial setup is not overly complex."
"Two of the very fascinating features that make SAP Mobile Platform stand out from other platforms are its offline capability and integration capability."
"OutSystems could improve by being more like GitHub. It would be more helpful for us for division management and version control for our application."
"Mobile apps should have been fully native."
"The PDD framework can't be used for the behavioral-driven development way of working."
"The initial setup is a little difficult."
"The documentation needs to be more robust."
"Writing custom code still needs to be done via Integration Studio. This might have been added to the IDE."
"The resource availability needs to be increased."
"The solution is costly."
"The cost of the SAP Mobile Platform is high, and there is room for improvement in its pricing."
"One drawback is that SAP Mobile Platform apps are only available through the browser, making offline capability more challenging to implement."
"SAP has announced that they'll be ending the support on the SAP platform."
"The licensing model is a bit dated."
"The toolkit to develop front end applications, especially native applications, is not that good."
"If it was low code or no code it would be ideal."
OutSystems is ranked 1st in Mobile Development Platforms with 46 reviews while SAP Mobile Platform is ranked 12th in Mobile Development Platforms with 7 reviews. OutSystems is rated 8.4, while SAP Mobile Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Mobile Platform writes "Flexible, well-designed, and offers good scalability". OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Ionic, whereas SAP Mobile Platform is most compared with Android SDK, Ionic and IBM MobileFirst. See our OutSystems vs. SAP Mobile Platform report.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.