We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I like most about this solution is that it allows me to push multiple policies on multiple followers at the same time."
"The interface is very easy to use. You can do most jobs from one single console."
"Centralized firewall management and update management are the most valuable features."
"The solution doesn't need a proxy for the Prisma Access Firewall."
"I found it easy to learn how to pull information from the logs."
"Technical support is helpful and knowledgeable."
"All of the reports and events from different locations can be managed centrally."
"The most valuable item is centralization and we can get all of the router bases in a single window."
"The stability is bulletproof."
"SecureChange makes our lives easier with automation."
"The APIs are the most valuable feature of this solution, as they facilitate integration with ServiceNow and other solutions."
"Tufin allows our say junior guys to learn how to view policies. It gives them a tool that will help them consolidate and optimize."
"The Topology Map, which feeds into our SecureChange - the latter being an automation platform - there's a lot of synergy between the two."
"The filtering of lots of criteria is very valuable."
"One of the biggest quick wins that we had with Tufin was cleaning up our firewall policies and rules. We cleaned out a lot of rules which helped our devices, longevity-wise, as well as speed-wise."
"The technical support is pretty good."
"We have had some issues in the past because integrating a new device is not intuitive."
"There could be more integrations with third parties."
"Palo Alto Networks Panorama has some bugs that could be fixed."
"I would like to have better analytics."
"My pain point is the automation process is not well-documented. There are some things that they could improve on there."
"At times we have noticed that we get into issues where Panorama is going too slow or has other little problems. The performance can suffer occasionally."
"The central firewall management could be better."
"The licensing costs are quite high."
"I would like to see them get rid of the REST APIs and use something more modern."
"I would like to see the hardware specifications improved."
"Their pricing can be better. It is not very transparent."
"I think that the interface could be cleaner, and easier to use."
"They are sort of at the pilot stage on some of their products. I saw the Orca and Iris products yesterday. My initial impression of these products were that they were good products, but I felt like some of their features overlapped with SecureTrack and SecureChange, which they are already doing. So, I just wondered what direction they're going in? I understand that they are cloud products, but are these security products going to overlap each other's features at some point? This is my initial concern."
"It could be a little more intuitive."
"The initial setup can be tough."
"One feature that is missing is the ability to assign a step in the workflow to a specific user at a specific time, based on how the previous steps of the workflow have been handled."
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 81 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 180 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, AlgoSec, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Skybox Security Suite and FireMon Security Manager, whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer and Cisco Defense Orchestrator. See our Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
