We performed a comparison between PeopleFluent Talent Management and PeopleSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution is extremely flexible and the automation capabilities are great."
"I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it with Power BI."
"The solution's scalability is good."
"The solution is easy to scale, expand and make bigger."
"A solid and mature product."
"I often say that PeopleSoft's greatest feature is how customizable it is."
"It's great for helping users deal with their supply chain."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It is a very stable ERP solution. It is also supported on Oracle Cloud and provides extensive features."
"The integration capabilities could be improved."
"The biggest disadvantage with things like PeopleSoft is that they do continuous support and fixes and upgrades. You get to choose when you want to implement that upgrade. However, in order to keep up, you have to upgrade."
"The area that could be improved is the upgrade process, it's not the easiest. Oracle stopped supporting our version. So we have to move either to the cloud or work in a non-supported situation. That was certainly a disadvantage. That's also the reason why we decided not to stay with Oracle. Now we are moving to SAP."
"The solution could improve by offering PeopleSoft site licenses. Currently, Oracle is pushing for everyone to transition to the cloud, but clients are discontent with this approach. Offering new PeopleSoft site licenses would be the most beneficial for our clients."
"The Work Center feature in PeopleSoft is a step in the right direction in consolidating someone's role-based interaction with the system. This enhanced functionality streamlines workflows and improves efficiency."
"I think the inventory part it should be simplified. There is the GR, or good receipt note, which is the time that the materials comes in, and the work days, etc. There is a lot of shuffling through pages, which creates a lot of problems for our users. They don't know which page to go to, where to create a GR, or where to create a stock entry. In other words, all the information is very daunting. It's very easy for people to understand and get a better clarity over it."
"The solution needs to work on its mobile technology. We're hoping in the next version we're working on implementing, 9.2, will have more of this."
"I would like for the initial rollout process to be completed faster so that it can be implemented in a more efficient manner."
"My developers want to use more HTML instead of the specialized tool, PeopleTools because, they say, it's better from a user perspective."
More PeopleFluent Talent Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
PeopleFluent Talent Management is ranked 29th in Talent Management while PeopleSoft is ranked 5th in Talent Management with 80 reviews. PeopleFluent Talent Management is rated 6.6, while PeopleSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PeopleFluent Talent Management writes "A flexible solution with superb automation capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". PeopleFluent Talent Management is most compared with , whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP and SAP ERP. See our PeopleFluent Talent Management vs. PeopleSoft report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.