We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Benefits Administration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Scales up very well."
"The customizations allow us to come up with a lot of complex labor rules. In the Philippines, there's a lot of different kinds of rules you need to be in compliance with. The solution offers up a lot of flexibility and customization that is perfect for our region's requirements."
"The solution's scalability is good."
"The most valuable feature is ERP application information."
"A valuable feature is FSCM."
"PeopleSoft is an amazing solution. Its users can have total control of the system, including PeopleCode, Application Engine and Component Interface, along with many other tools delivered by PeopleSoft."
"The most valuable feature for us is the integration between the HR Payroll and Financials modules"
"It is a customizable product. We can customize it based on our needs, which is one of the features that I like about PeopleSoft. As far as financial accounting is concerned, the user interface is very good. You can also configure Chart of Accounts for all performance insights."
"The most valuable feature is the Personnel Administration."
"It's very suitable for large, multi-geography companies but also very suitable for medium companies with multi-geography operations."
"Customers can create custom infotypes to store any custom data points."
"The master data where most of the reports were run from was the most valuable. We were quite satisfied with this module."
"The tool's best feature is SAP SuccessFactors."
"The most valuable feature, in my view, is the level of exceptions or error messages that come back when something goes wrong."
"All our employee data, like performance and payroll, is managed through SAP HCM."
"The valuable features of SAP HCM include managing employee data from hiring to retirement."
"The learning and development side of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Initial setup can be complex without training or use of consultants."
"Having applications which provide more enhanced features and user-friendly elements."
"PeopleSoft can improve by having proper connectors. It's very difficult to change some interfaces with the other systems."
"Global payroll could be easier to use."
"There could be more adaptability of the system."
"It would be helpful for the end-user if the reports were customized. They would be able to select the fields while generating their reports."
"I think the inventory part it should be simplified. There is the GR, or good receipt note, which is the time that the materials comes in, and the work days, etc. There is a lot of shuffling through pages, which creates a lot of problems for our users. They don't know which page to go to, where to create a GR, or where to create a stock entry. In other words, all the information is very daunting. It's very easy for people to understand and get a better clarity over it."
"I'm currently working for a state-owned government company, and we need to follow some standards and regulations. We also have a strategy to be followed. Sometimes the template and the format are not available in the SAP HCM, so we have to work around this limitation. The tax also sometimes changes in my country, and we have to redo everything to change the payroll calculations, benefits, and things like that. The talent management feature can be improved. It is currently very simple in SAP HCM. SAP is also very hard to integrate. In terms of monitoring, there are no monitoring tools, but as long as we take care of the disk capacity, there is no problem."
"The current platform is quite rigid and not as flexible and end-user friendly as other HR solutions."
"There are already success factors for the cloud solution which cannot be integrated into S/4 HANA."
"SAP HCM's long and tedious transactions can be improved."
"Reports need to be added on the time management side."
"On the personnel administration side, it's very difficult to do custom development."
"The talent modules are lacking in HCM, so I would recommend switching to SuccessFactors for talent management, but HCM excels at time management and payroll."
"It needs a lot of end user training as it is not intuitive at all."
PeopleSoft is ranked 3rd in Benefits Administration with 80 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 4th in Benefits Administration with 48 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Allows you to generate reports, easy integration and offers out-of-the-box support". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP and PeopleStrong , whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and UKG. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Benefits Administration vendors and best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Benefits Administration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.