We performed a comparison between Portnox Clear and Portnox CORE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The solution has a valuable reporting feature."
"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."
"The Vidahost feature is currently in action, and it appears to be providing valuable data insights."
"This is a self-sufficient network monitoring and security product that saves time and employee resources."
"It's a stable product."
"There is an add-on feature for application control to kill unwanted applications when launched on a user's device."
"It's agentless, and it's scalable."
"The minute people have issues on their network, we can see what is happening right away."
"Previous to the deployment we didn't have complete visibility of all the endpoints, all the devices that are connected to the network. But with the deployment of portnox, we could see all the devices and where they're connecting. We can equally segregate and apply different rules, policies to each location that we didn't monitor specifically."
"I am impressed with the solution's voucher capability and authentication. The tool is integrated with Active Direct storage."
"From a resource perspective, the OEM can do better in terms of resource utilization."
"As there are no agents in Portnox Clear, the customers of the product cannot download any agents on their devices, making them unsure if the product offers proper security."
"I believe there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of integration."
"The licensing is based on a per-port price, even when you are not using all of the ports, and this is something that could be improved."
"The price could be better."
"It could be a little cheaper."
"The product should consider more integration with vendors like Huawei. It should also improve visibility. The solution should offer a partner portal that can provide customers training on the in and out of the solution."
"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."
"Portnox CORE can improve on support for unmanaged switches (or hubs) and other brands of network devices. These kinds of devices are still in use in organisations, especially SMEs who cannot afford to buy a managed switch."
"We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE."
"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great."
Portnox Clear is ranked 12th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews while Portnox CORE is ranked 10th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 14 reviews. Portnox Clear is rated 7.6, while Portnox CORE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Portnox Clear writes "An affordable tool to monitor routers and access points". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Simple UI, easy deployment but slow authentication times for devices". Portnox Clear is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, whereas Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and Sophos Network Access Control. See our Portnox CORE vs. Portnox Clear report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.