We performed a comparison between Qualitia Automation Studio and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are it is open source and has multiple languages and browser support. It's very useful."
"The tool is easy to use and log in with respect to other tools. It is open-source. We can customize the product. I also like its security."
"Since Selenium HQ has multiple plug-ins, we can use it with multiple tools and multiple languages."
"Data parametrization and parallelization are the most important features in any automation tool."
"We found the initial setup to be straightforward."
"Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run."
"What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to catch content from website."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"I continuously see failures in threads when it is running in parallel."
"To simplify the development process, everyone needs to do a Selenium Framework to acquire the web application functions and features from Selenium methods."
"Selenium could offer better ways to record and create scripts. IDE is available, however, it can be improved."
"The installation could be simplified, it is a bit difficult to install."
"If the test scenarios are not subdivided correctly, it is very likely that maintenance will become very expensive and re-use is unlikely."
"I would like to see a library of bomb files with an automated process and integration with Jenkins and Slack."
"It is not easy to make IE plus Selenium work good as other browsers. Firefox and Chrome are the best ones to work with Selenium."
"Coding skills are required to use Selenium, so it could be made more user-friendly for non-programmers."
Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 103 reviews. Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with OpenText UFT One and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Automation Anywhere (AA).
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.